Ike Ibeabuchi resume Vs. Vitaly Klitschko resume?

Klitschko imo

 

He fought 20 times and faced 2 good fighters.

 

Yep Ike is unbeaten but he wasn't around half as long as Klitschko.
Vitali proved himself repeatedly at elite level , over many years.
Ikes resume is based on a very short peak.
Klitschko fought world class heavyweight over two eras , late 90 s to early 2010
Ikes entire top level resume roughly fits in to 18 months.
Got to be the K bro for me buddy.

 

If you compared Ibeabuchi's first 21 fights against Klitschko's first 21, and comparing Ibeabuchi's wins up to the Afinni fight, against Klitschko's fights when he fought Herbie Hyde, Ibeabuchi would have the better resume. But compare Klitschko's full record to Ibeabuchi's 21 fights,which is infact his full record, then Klitschko has the more complete and better resume.

 

And even then, iirc, opinion is split roughly 50/50 as to who won the Tua fight. Ike could easily be 1-1 against contenders.

 

Ike has better top wins, Vitali has a better resume.

 

Actually he never beat an elite fighter. He lost to 2 best guys he faced - Byrd and Lewis. His best wins are Sanders and Peter who weren't better boxers than Tua and Byrd whom Ike beat. He didn't test himself too much, especially during the second career. His claim to fame is a fight he lost.

 

But he proved himself at an higher level than Ike.
Ike had two good names really, that's it.

 

100%

 

Ike’s record was sweet but short. Vitali has too many wins against ranked fighters and was a world champion

 

Fat Sanders would have knocked down that version of Byrd out of the ring and Tua would be lucky to go 1-3 agianst Adamek, Gomez, Solis, and Donald.

 

Wouldas don't exist.