Ike Ibeabuchi v Primo Carnera

Yeah - because, of course, Baer was the archetype for the 'skilled slickster'.

 

Doesn't Matter. My argument doesn't have to make sense. I don't have to use facts. I can say whatever I want even if it is false (and it still count). Everyone else is wrong and I am right.

I am the face of boxingforum24.

 

Ike was hardly a skilless oaf. He had a decent and developing jab, a light outs uppercut and hard right and left hand. Good enough to track down and take out a prime Chris Byrd.

Besides Primo wasn't hard to hit. Byrd a slick southpaw was.

This content is protected

 

More like the micro pen!s of boxingforum24.

 

Says the guy who thinks Robinson would be a journeyman today

You're opinions don't hold water here lmfao!

 

Ike was really good.

If he were from older times the modernists would call him clumsy lacking of technique because his form and movement are not perfectly aesthetic.

 

The SRR thing was said in jest as you well know (at least I would hope).

My opinions are not respected in classic you are correct and I see no reason why they should be given my admitted 'casual' status. That said, I'm sure my view on what part of the forums anatomy you best represent is spot on and would be met with near universal agreement.

 

Ha! You don't even have any boxing opinion of value to contribute as usual!

 

Has no one warned you about the dangers of drinking meths...?




It's not doing your neuroses any good.

 

Ibeabuchi>Carnera

Also, Raymi>Marciano

 

Is this a joke?

 

Ibeabuchi was a killer with power and an iron chin he beats the hell out of Primo

 

I like your attempted satire, but I'm not sure there's enough exaggeration for it to be altogether satirical.
.

 

Who has the more awkward combos, Fury or Carnera?

 

Ike makes chicken parmiagiana out of Carnera. Such a mismatch shouldn't even be allowed to happen, Carnera might not make it out of the ring alive.