ike ibeabuchi vs evander holyfield in 1997.???

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by anut, Oct 30, 2010.


  1. anut

    anut Boxing Addict banned

    6,731
    11
    Apr 4, 2007
    who wins and why>>????:smoke
     
  2. swedish chef

    swedish chef Member Full Member

    218
    1
    Oct 18, 2010
    ike had every thing except his marbles, but if he was still around ,i dont thinck lennox and evander and the klits would be getting all the attention!
     
  3. swedish chef

    swedish chef Member Full Member

    218
    1
    Oct 18, 2010
  4. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    I think Lewis will employ the same game plan he did against Tua and beat Ike on points.

    I think Ike is a bigger version of Holyfield, and, slightly better in stamina (due to youth) and hits harder. I pick him to beat Holyfield on points.
     
  5. Ellis

    Ellis New Member Full Member

    76
    0
    Oct 5, 2009
    Would have been a great fight, or even fights. I see Evander winning the first fight by using his superior big fight experiance and pacing himself more for a big effort in the last three rounds. A still improving Ike then gains revenge in the rematch by picking his punches better and wearing down a now ageing Holyfield. I really believe that had Ike been around he would have spent the last decade or so fighting at championship level. What a shame.
     
  6. DamonD

    DamonD Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,285
    39
    Nov 19, 2004
    Ike would probably have too much work for the '97 Holyfield to keep up with, unless he could really clamp down and outmuscle him in the clinch.

    Ike was far from the polished killer of legend, but it's not a particularly great style match-up for Holyfield at this time of his career and while he'd have the quality I'd be concerned that Ike would be able to maintain the quantity that would force the win on points.

    Now, the Holyfield of just a few years before...