Ike Ibeabuchi vs Jack Dempsey

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, May 27, 2018.


  1. Sting like a bean

    Sting like a bean Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,047
    1,597
    Apr 9, 2017
    Oh Jesus, I need to get some sleep.:duh
     
    Unforgiven likes this.
  2. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    “One sided as you can get”

    Except Firpo floored Dempsey 2x, hurt him badly on the second knockdown when he fell out of the ring...a reporter on the type writer saved Dempsey by pushing him back into the ring...pretty embarrassing for Dempsey to get hit that much by such an unskilled clumsy oaf.

    “Savage”

    Prove it by taking on your top competition. Dempsey did Not!
     
  3. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    Wait...Firpo didn’t hurt Dempsey right? It was the wind that blew back Dempsey into the ropes dazed :rolleyes:
     
  4. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    It’s a fact the reporter using the typewriter pushes Dempsey back in...deal with it. Dempsey nearly lost his title to a fat unskilled buffoon

    You think Dempsey wasn’t even hurt by Firpo! LOL

    Let me guess Dempsey didn’t duck harry wills either?
     
  5. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005

    Here is a post from historian Steve Compton


    “The signing (the one with Floyd Fitzsimmons) was tantamount to a payoff of step aside money to Wills. Fitzsimmons was a close friend of Dempsey's (Dempsey had once given his own car to Floyd's wife) and wrote a contract that no promoter in the world at that time could have fulfilled allowing Dempsey to walk away from the Wills fight and allowing Wills to take home $50,000.

    The other "contract" Dempsey signed. Which wasnt really a contract was admitted by Dempsey in his bio to have been written in a manner that allowed him out of it. A quick newspaper search will show you that it was not a contract. It was simply an "agreement" that stated Dempsey "would" fight Wills within sixty days of the signing if a promoter made Dempsey a "favorable" offer. There was no date for the fight, no site, no promoter, and no guidelines stating what Dempsey or Kearns would consider favorable. In essence a promoter could offer them a $10,000,000 purse and they could walk away saying it was unfavorable. Thats just what they did (not that they were offered ten million) because no promoter could stage such an event within sixty days and Dempsey and Kearns wouldnt accept ANY monetary offer. So they walked away.

    Dempsey always blamed the New York commission for barring a Wills fight. However, this is bull****. After Tamany Hall won back the govt in 1922/1923 it was populated by progressives who were very eager to get the black vote. They pushed and pushed and pushed for a Dempsey-Wills bout. Regardless of the racial views of the Athletic commission there were literally tons of venues that were offering to host the match both inside and outside the country.”



    https://news.google.com/newspapers?...AIBAJ&sjid=sVQDAAAAIBAJ&pg=4012,5825153&hl=en

    Dempsey is first on record saying 'Wills will never fight for the title'

    The NY Board was then sued by Wills, the board then ordered Dempsey to defend against Wills or lose the world championship. The only reason Dempsey got out of it was because 'the check bounced'
     
    Seamus and Colonel Sanders like this.
  6. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,236
    49,586
    Apr 27, 2005
    Some seem to indeed.
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,997
    28,008
    Feb 15, 2006
    I have an alternative explanation.

    Dempsey was reluctant to fight Wills, but wanted to cash out in a big money fight against him.

    The negotiations for the fight, were taking place just before he announced his retirement, and the purses on offer were the biggest of his career.

    Now lets look at the sequence of events:

    The New York State Athletic Commission blocks one fight.

    Dempsey's cheque bounces for the second.

    Then Dempsey retires.

    I suspect that Dempsey wanted to cash out against Wills, and could probably have lived with a loss, for the money on offer!
     
  8. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,997
    28,008
    Feb 15, 2006
    At worst, he could be bought, for the right price!
     
  9. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,715
    8,951
    Nov 21, 2009
    Great truth

    Garbage and by the #1 Dempsey hater on classic forum
     
    Last edited: May 30, 2018
  10. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,715
    8,951
    Nov 21, 2009
    Lmao :) going to Compton to get any opinion of Jack Dempsey is like going to Isis to learn about JESUS Christ!
     
  11. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,133
    53,520
    Feb 11, 2005
    If it's such garbage, where are your references that debunk it? I've seen the details from people other than Compton that support his rendition of what went down. The "contracts" weren't worth the paper they were written on. Are you holding onto some materials that counter those?

    Also, anyone quoting Kahn's flimsy propagandist read is proclaiming their ignorance on these affairs. That book is a low point in boxing literature and more akin to the hero worshipping tripe of many decades earlier.
     
  12. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,715
    8,951
    Nov 21, 2009
     
  13. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,764
    Jul 1, 2015
    There were a million and one reasons the fight didn't happen. Dempsey's manager was against it, his promoter was against it, checks were bouncing and other promoters were clearly unreliable, not the right amount of money, commissions blocked it, even the government blocked it at one point, blah blah blah the list is endless.

    At the end of the day it's Jack Dempsey not superman. It was hard enough going against just your manager in those days. Imagine what it's like going against the most powerful boxing figure in the world at that time named Tex Rickard.
     
    The Morlocks likes this.
  14. It's Ovah

    It's Ovah I am very feel me good. Full Member

    14,882
    19,168
    Sep 5, 2016


    I believe that's because Dempsey didn't hit hard enough to separate him totally from his senses.

    Cool. When and to whom?

    No, they couldn't.

    No problem. I wish some of the other posters arguing in favour of Dempsey would realise that.

    Nah, it really isn't.

    No one ever said Tua was indestructible.

    So you want to apply his KO loss as a teen amateur to his whole pro career. Fine.

    To clarify my position, in case special snowflakes get the wrong idea and throw their toys out the pram over something I never said.

    Yup.

    Oliver McCall wants a word with you.
     
    The Morlocks likes this.
  15. It's Ovah

    It's Ovah I am very feel me good. Full Member

    14,882
    19,168
    Sep 5, 2016
    I can get with this. Byrd had never been stopped or knocked out before, and could have approached the Ike fight with a little more recklessness than he later displayed. Hard to say.

    Personally I don't think he wasn't noticeably different from his prime incarnation by this point (he was already 28), and was actually clowning Ike before the stoppage, the way he did many larger fighters to come after him. The difference was that Ike was able to get to him, and they weren't.

    I believe his advocates know exactly what he was: a guy with a huge punch, a granite chin, and a very solid workrate in his prime. Literally no one has said he was invincible, or an unstoppable wrecking machine or whatever.

    You've mentioned time and again that punching power alone does not guarantee you success, and Tua is a case in point. Anyone who could keep him at the end of their jab and weather a few shaky moments here and there was in with a great shot at beating him.

    Choose to come at him and match fire with fire and you were in for a tough night. Ike did so, and not only lasted the distance without suffering any significant hurt, but ended up winning.

    That's why it's an impressive performance, because of the way Ike beat Tua, not the fact that he beat him in the first place.

    Tua was inconsistent in his career, and sometimes dialled it in for fights. Plus, he was short and had a ton of stylistic limitations that fighters would often exploit.

    That doesn't have any relevance to the point of discussion though. Like I said in the post above, if Tua managed to hurt you (drop you), you were pretty much finished. If you don't agree with me, find me an opponent in Tua's prime that got dropped by him and went on to complete the fight.

    Sorry, but what relevance does that have to the discussion?
     
    Last edited: May 31, 2018
    mrkoolkevin likes this.