what truth? you have simply repeated what others said because you have no opinions of your own you have embarrassed yourself by talking about a fight you did not watchatsch I will not ask for your scorecard because I know you don't have one fool:smooch
1 - DLH 2- DLH 3- IQ 4- DLH 5- DLH 6- IQ 7- IO 8- IQ 9- IQ 10- DLH 11- DLH or Even 12 - DLH 10-8 add it up :hi:
The fact that you gave 4 out of the first 5 rounds for De La Hoya means that either you didn't see the fight or that you simply don't understand boxingatsch Why am I wasting my time arguing with an absolute idiot?:roll:
GTFO of my thread troll. Your leader Pimp C already agreed it was no robbery and could have gone either way, just like the rest of us guys who can score a fight. Some scored it for DLH, others for Quartey, but in no way shape or form a robbery.
The 3rd was close but I think Ike took it with a good hook with like 10 seconds left. Good fight, underrated.
Very good fight. Very tactical. The battle of the jabs. Sometimes DLH won big with it, sometimes Quartey. Infact, Oscar would at times neutralize Quartey's jab by double pumping his, crouching low and shooting it up, and using an overhand right. Both guys showed tons of class and ability. Oscar showed he was multi dimensional. This is defitnately a classic.
He just called me an imbecil because I agree with Pimp C that it wasn't a robbery and it could have gone wither way depending on what you look for... He's either a troll, a hater, or a moron. Either way he's pathetic. The only reason I don't ban him is because every boxing web site needs a village idiot and a whipping boy, we have both in one with him.. He's valueble. :yep