Larios was a tune up at that stage of his career. Why would you ask me this question?(underlined) We've had a nice debate, and then you ask me this? lol. People voted that PAc had the better resume in one thread. Besides those guys(the big 3), I only found maybe 1 or 2 more guys on his resume who even matter. I thought Pac won fight 1, and I thought J.M.M won fight 2.
Yeah, and Floyd is disrespected for facing Baldomir(linear champion) and not Cotto or AM(non linear champions)...go figure:huh
Lucero was a bum. PAc beat Sasakul in his 12th fight. He then lost 2 times after that regardless of the excuse. He lost both times by ko too. He had done well after that and I respct him for turning it around. I'm picking PAc to ko Dlh. Not many people are thinking that way.
Do you really not get WHY? Baldomir was the WEAKEST WW champ we've ever had. When he was the Linear World champ, there were probably 6-7 WW's who'd have beaten him. A belt or doesn't make a fighter, the fighter makes the belt. And I don't think anyone would disagree with me saying Baldomir was a gimme for most any top WW who wanted a World Title.
yeah he can, but the question is will he. we'll have to see if he does. but he better not look like he did when he fought mayo
The fight was tight up until the championship rounds. I had the fight even until 10. Rds. 11 and 12 were the deciding factor and JMM swept the last two. I think those wicked body shots from Marquez sapped PAC in the later rds. The both are pretty evenly matched. They both are elite, IMO
Good fight analysis. You really captured the whole fight there, it is that simple. YOU STUPID ****ING NUTHUGGER!!!!
i agree, i'm a fan to and i dont think he won either...but in close fights like these, whoever gets the win you should just give them all due respect and not try to say the other guy was robbed but the world is filled to the brim with idiots..... so i guess it cant be helped....