How does that change the fact that both weren't promoted by Arum?. Answer is, it changes nothing and you're just typing in trash to look alive. By the way, Pacquiao will also be a massive favorite going in against Khan and will be expected to win easily.
who said it changed the fact , khan is a haymon fighter who arum hates, khan is a much more dangerous opponent than algeiri and a loss would be a big hit to top rank , pac would lose more foothold in mayweather negotitations with a loss to khan and his overall value would take a hit
Thanks for explaining "value" according to yourself, but it remains irrelevant. Algieri and Marquez weren't promoted by Arum when they fought Pacquiao.
Indeed, to those that followed Arum. So lets repeat again and see if you will be able to answer coherently and directly this time. Khan barks "I WANT PACQUIAO!", Arum responds, Khan goes quiet for three straight weeks without a single word mentioning Pacquiao. Is it normal for Khan, knowing his vocal behavior online, to stay quiet without saying a single thing?. If he sent his team "down under", wouldn't you expect him to be vocal about it and about being turned down?.
Because its nothing but your opinion. You said "It will be risky for Arum to fight Khan, because he's not in his stable". I responded with "Neither are/were Algieri and Marquez". You went on to explain value and risk.
I never asked you to "always" post a source, you said there's a video I asked you where it is. Simple, no?. I never said you made it up which is why I also said in my post that Arum makes the fights, not Roach.