I'm impressed that there are so few "robbery" threads today.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Slothrop, Jun 14, 2009.


  1. Slothrop

    Slothrop Boxing Junkie banned

    11,540
    2
    Nov 25, 2004
    I expected at least half a dozen on the first page.
     
  2. Little Pea

    Little Pea 'A' grade boxing fan Full Member

    11,750
    1
    Dec 7, 2007
    One would be too many.
     
  3. Slothrop

    Slothrop Boxing Junkie banned

    11,540
    2
    Nov 25, 2004
    :lol:

    Agreed.
     
  4. NeckBreaknAiken

    NeckBreaknAiken Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,014
    4
    Jul 30, 2008
    That's because no one expected Clottey to win a decision.


    I had it 114-113 Clottey, but can easily see 114-113 the other way. It wasn't a true robbery, as Clottey more than had opportunity to pull it through.

    But I don't think Cotto is gonna even think about rematching him outside of NYC. And I don't think Bob Arum is gonna let him.
     
  5. The Professor

    The Professor Socialist Ring Leader Staff Member

    26,526
    18,909
    Sep 29, 2008
    Surprisingly, there were only two. I combined them. Would have combined the rest too had they appeared!:lol:
     
  6. Dfiyah

    Dfiyah New Member Full Member

    8
    0
    Nov 25, 2007
    That's because no one expected Clottey to win a decision.


    I had it 114-113 Clottey, but can easily see 114-113 the other way. It wasn't a true robbery, as Clottey more than had opportunity to pull it through.

    But I don't think Cotto is gonna even think about rematching him outside of NYC. And I don't think Bob Arum is gonna let him.


    My sentiments exactly.