"I'm not a cheater like Antonio Margarito or Manny Pacquiao"-- Floyd Mayweather

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by jso416, Feb 27, 2012.


  1. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    :patsch..Your ***** ass was already owned with that one-your fa33ot ass didnt hold up to the bet..lil *****:deal

    nah but they not-they really my cars-U seem jealous:think...LMFAO-The funny part is, everything I told you was true...didn't lie at all...:rofl..jealous muh fukas like yourself just can't handle the truth....

    showed this guy pictures and he still don't believe it-showed another poster my bar card and he downplayed that too...guess what though-I look out my window and my rides are still there, my bar card is still in my wallet, and I have a very nice home in Pt. Loma.

    fukin idiot *******s:patsch..they ask and ask and ask for pics etc...they get em, then they downgrade em...My wife from Costa Rica too....uhhh your fault:deal:hi:

    you should live up to the bet and ban yourself..till than u just a ***** in this forum.:deal
     
  2. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    You got fukin played Doby-u asked for pics of my rides-I showed you pics of my rides and 2 of my rental properties and you still downplayed it-can't argue with illogical fuks like yourself.

    Your just a troll-u don't know boxing-u just know Manny and what goes on around him..try again though.

    *******S

    1. Ignore Facts

    2. Downgrade valid info

    3. Pay 0 attention to any argument negative to their own

    4. DO NOT address facts shown to them, in rebuttal to their own posts.

    5. Insult the poster, rather than focus on the argument at hand; by doing this, you lose the argument easy as you don't even address the argument the opposite poster is putting up.

    6. Come up with off the wall $hit, with nothing to back it, just to make yourself look like you said something valid; many times this off the wall $hit has nothing to do with boxing
     
  3. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
  4. TheRoadWarrior4

    TheRoadWarrior4 Active Member Full Member

    950
    0
    Aug 4, 2010

    No, the allegation is that Floyd is slandering Pac. Unless you're telling me that Floyd is the one who's now suing Manny?
     
  5. tarugojones

    tarugojones Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,877
    0
    Jan 22, 2010
    X2:deal
     
  6. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,392
    11,412
    Jan 6, 2007
    Yes, technically true.

    But Pac is claiming that Floyd is slandering him BY STATING (without evidence) THAT PAC IS JUICING.

    It's that second allegation I was referring to.
     
  7. TheRoadWarrior4

    TheRoadWarrior4 Active Member Full Member

    950
    0
    Aug 4, 2010
    But the so-called slander is falsifiable. If Pac isn't willing to prove that Floyd's wrong or that his comments were made without evidence, then I don't see how he can win.

    Since when is the burden of proof NOT on the accuser?
     
  8. rayrobinson

    rayrobinson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,656
    706
    Dec 8, 2009
    Floyd is still seriously unstable whenever Manny is mentioned. I dont think I have ever heard a fighter talk about another fighter so much when he isnt fighting them??
     
  9. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,392
    11,412
    Jan 6, 2007

    No, lad, you're mixing up the two levels of accusation.

    The burden of proof IS on the accuser here.

    Pac is accusing Floyd of making slanderous comments. He can prove his accusation by producing eyewitness testimony and/or video evidence showing Floyd doing just that.

    Q.E.D.

    Case closed.
     
  10. BOXING DON

    BOXING DON Active Member Full Member

    892
    1
    Sep 19, 2010
    This moronic chimp doesn't know when to stfu, does he? Next week, the little ***** will say, "that's not what I said, don't put words in my mouth, unless the words are, Fiddy's *****".
     
  11. TheRoadWarrior4

    TheRoadWarrior4 Active Member Full Member

    950
    0
    Aug 4, 2010
    So hypothetically Pac could have been juicing this whole time and win a defamation lawsuit against Floyd who was telling the truth?

    And hypothetically Floyd would have no way of proving that he's telling the truth, because Pac still won't take the test even though that's the whole reason he made the statements in the first place?
     
  12. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,392
    11,412
    Jan 6, 2007
    Dat's right.

    Floyd could, of course, use the defence of truth, but Pac is not compelled to assist in delivering that proof.


    Otherwise, as I mentioned earlier in the thread, I could compel you to lay open your house to inspection by stating that you had dead bodies and such, stored there.

    You could dispel such charges by permitting a search.

    But why the hell should you ?
     
  13. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee Loyal Member

    46,413
    13,990
    Mar 5, 2006
    You played too much GTA video games. You don't own any cars, you don't own any property in SD and you CERTAINLY aren't a lawyer. You don't have the writing style to be one nor the intelligence.
     
  14. boyschoir

    boyschoir Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,662
    0
    Nov 6, 2011
    :rofl:good

    DobyZhee, a typical Floydiot for you is everything! :rofl

    a lawyer, idolizing a fighter who makes fair offers, idolizing a fighter who accuses a fellow fighter w/out any proof, idolizing a fighter who says it's easy work but needs to be tested, etc etc...here's a new one on a separate thread, illegal hand wraps! :good

    close your eyes and let your mind flow into Floydiot-Land, that may help you understand them! :yep