im now convinced

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by pugilist_boyd, Jun 26, 2009.


  1. pugilist_boyd

    pugilist_boyd BUSTED UP PUG Full Member

    830
    3
    Jun 19, 2007
    Ive been studying jim jeffries for 6 months in detail and from all of this im now convinced that in his prime he would have steamrolled thru jack johnson.I wont speculize about the drug found in big jeffs body after the fight wich remained for a long time,that deadend his brain,body and nerve effects,or how he drained himself in training ,or the move and fight locations resulting in other conditions.All im saying is that without the 6 years layoff if the fight would have taken place he would have walked thru or at least beaten the great jack johnson.

    i also am convinced of the cellar story and got a good laugh about it,although jack was a great boxer i dont think he would have taken jeff.also the holding in there fight i thiught was rediculus,even though i know this was part of jacks style.
     
  2. dezbeast

    dezbeast Active Member Full Member

    552
    5
    Mar 1, 2009
    Even Jeffries himself said that he never would have beaten Johnson at his best. I think I'll take his word over anyone else's.
     
  3. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Sometimes a quote takes a life on its own on the web. There was no source for that quote. In truth what Jeffries said after the fight is if he was in his prime, he would have won. As it was he was too old to come back.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,998
    48,087
    Mar 21, 2007
    You have to take these things with a pinch sometimes.

    But I believe Jim was right on this occasion and that Johnson should be favoured.
     
  5. HomicideHenry

    HomicideHenry Many Talents, No Successes Full Member

    2,090
    84
    Feb 4, 2009
    Is a myth. Guys like Bert Sugar and Ken Burns want to elaborate on it, but what Jeffries said was had it been ten years earlier, he would have won. Hell, even Johnson after his career was over, said that Jeffries was the greatest HW champion of all time.

    But if you want to throw around quotes, Joe Louis once said he could NEVER have beaten Rocky Marciano in his prime.
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,998
    48,087
    Mar 21, 2007
    Here's a nice quote from Jeffries right after:

    "The things I used to do were impossible. For instance, I used to shoot in a right-hand body punch, a short range body-blow that never failed me. When I tried it today, the snap wasn't there. It was only a love tap...I guess it's all my own fault. I was getting along nicely and living peacefully on my alfalfa farm, but when they started calling for me I guess my pride got the better of my judgement. I worked long and hard to condition myself, and I was fit, as far as my strength goes, but the old snap and dash were not with me. Six years ago the result might have been different..."
     
  7. dezbeast

    dezbeast Active Member Full Member

    552
    5
    Mar 1, 2009
    My source is not from the web and I didn't quote Jeffries, otherwise you would see quotation marks. The actual quote was even more demeaning.
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,740
    29,094
    Jun 2, 2006
    I am not aware of any drug found in JEFFRIES body ,immediately after the fight he said he had been beaten fairly.
    Later he allowed his name to be put to a story about drugged tea, I beleive this can be found in"Two Fisted Jeff ," by Hugh Fullerton.
    I dont beleive Jeffries was drugged .What is undeniable is that he was years past his prime, anyone picking Jeffries over Johnson has as good a case as those picking Johnson over Jeffries imo, the thing is by its very nature ,ie The young Stag dethroning the old Stag, great fighters seldom meet in their prime.Johnson was in his, Jeffries was over the hill.
    I pick Johnson over Jefffries, but no one should be dogmatic about this one,imo.Rather like saying Monzon beats Hagler , he may well have done ,equally it could go the other way imo.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,998
    48,087
    Mar 21, 2007
    Jeffries wasn't drugged. That's nonsense.
     
  10. HomicideHenry

    HomicideHenry Many Talents, No Successes Full Member

    2,090
    84
    Feb 4, 2009
    I dont believe him to be drugged. If he was, then undoubtedly Jeffries was the toughest, greatest, heavyweight of all time---nobody drugged can go those one sided 15 rounds like that after having to lose 110 pounds and been inactive 6 years! But if he was, by God, the ring never had a greater fighter.
     
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,740
    29,094
    Jun 2, 2006
    Maybe they put that stuff ,bute into him ,that they run horses on in the States?
    Doesnt help you in a fight, but you can f**k for a week! :lol:
     
  12. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Strength/Size were Jeffries biggest assets and you dont lose them past prime or not. Johnson was the bigger stronger man pushing Jeffries round. Johnson is the better boxer, faster, better defense
     
  13. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    To apeace the racist press/public?
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,998
    48,087
    Mar 21, 2007
    Johnson didn't do a lot of appeasing in his career...I think it's more likely an old fashioned (even then) attempt to boost a vanquished foe increasing the value of his own win.

    Or it may have been how he saw things. Certianly wouldn't be an uneven view at that point in history.

    I thought that chick ditched you? You should get a new avatar, can't be good for you that.
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,740
    29,094
    Jun 2, 2006
    If Johnson was in a court room he would be termed "an unreliable witness", he told more half truths and distorted more facts than anyone I know.
    Well, actually that's not true ,there is one bloke :lol::lol::lol::lol: