Ive been studying jim jeffries for 6 months in detail and from all of this im now convinced that in his prime he would have steamrolled thru jack johnson.I wont speculize about the drug found in big jeffs body after the fight wich remained for a long time,that deadend his brain,body and nerve effects,or how he drained himself in training ,or the move and fight locations resulting in other conditions.All im saying is that without the 6 years layoff if the fight would have taken place he would have walked thru or at least beaten the great jack johnson. i also am convinced of the cellar story and got a good laugh about it,although jack was a great boxer i dont think he would have taken jeff.also the holding in there fight i thiught was rediculus,even though i know this was part of jacks style.
Even Jeffries himself said that he never would have beaten Johnson at his best. I think I'll take his word over anyone else's.
Sometimes a quote takes a life on its own on the web. There was no source for that quote. In truth what Jeffries said after the fight is if he was in his prime, he would have won. As it was he was too old to come back.
You have to take these things with a pinch sometimes. But I believe Jim was right on this occasion and that Johnson should be favoured.
Is a myth. Guys like Bert Sugar and Ken Burns want to elaborate on it, but what Jeffries said was had it been ten years earlier, he would have won. Hell, even Johnson after his career was over, said that Jeffries was the greatest HW champion of all time. But if you want to throw around quotes, Joe Louis once said he could NEVER have beaten Rocky Marciano in his prime.
Here's a nice quote from Jeffries right after: "The things I used to do were impossible. For instance, I used to shoot in a right-hand body punch, a short range body-blow that never failed me. When I tried it today, the snap wasn't there. It was only a love tap...I guess it's all my own fault. I was getting along nicely and living peacefully on my alfalfa farm, but when they started calling for me I guess my pride got the better of my judgement. I worked long and hard to condition myself, and I was fit, as far as my strength goes, but the old snap and dash were not with me. Six years ago the result might have been different..."
My source is not from the web and I didn't quote Jeffries, otherwise you would see quotation marks. The actual quote was even more demeaning.
I am not aware of any drug found in JEFFRIES body ,immediately after the fight he said he had been beaten fairly. Later he allowed his name to be put to a story about drugged tea, I beleive this can be found in"Two Fisted Jeff ," by Hugh Fullerton. I dont beleive Jeffries was drugged .What is undeniable is that he was years past his prime, anyone picking Jeffries over Johnson has as good a case as those picking Johnson over Jeffries imo, the thing is by its very nature ,ie The young Stag dethroning the old Stag, great fighters seldom meet in their prime.Johnson was in his, Jeffries was over the hill. I pick Johnson over Jefffries, but no one should be dogmatic about this one,imo.Rather like saying Monzon beats Hagler , he may well have done ,equally it could go the other way imo.
I dont believe him to be drugged. If he was, then undoubtedly Jeffries was the toughest, greatest, heavyweight of all time---nobody drugged can go those one sided 15 rounds like that after having to lose 110 pounds and been inactive 6 years! But if he was, by God, the ring never had a greater fighter.
Maybe they put that stuff ,bute into him ,that they run horses on in the States? Doesnt help you in a fight, but you can f**k for a week!
Strength/Size were Jeffries biggest assets and you dont lose them past prime or not. Johnson was the bigger stronger man pushing Jeffries round. Johnson is the better boxer, faster, better defense
Johnson didn't do a lot of appeasing in his career...I think it's more likely an old fashioned (even then) attempt to boost a vanquished foe increasing the value of his own win. Or it may have been how he saw things. Certianly wouldn't be an uneven view at that point in history. I thought that chick ditched you? You should get a new avatar, can't be good for you that.
If Johnson was in a court room he would be termed "an unreliable witness", he told more half truths and distorted more facts than anyone I know. Well, actually that's not true ,there is one bloke