im now convinced

I did not want to argue about the drug, if you would have understood i only mentioned it because i thought it to be interisting.A doctor took a blood sample directly after the fight and then a few days later or someething like that,supposebly they both showed poisen and the docter was bewilderd.I shouldnt have mentioned that i even reAd it now several will make it into a poisen thread.
MY MAIN POINT IS IVE HEARD OF SO MANY OLD FIGHTERS JIM FOUGHT AND SOME THAT JOHNSON FOUGHT AND EXPERTS AND REFS,SAY THE OLD JIM WOULD HAVE BEATEN JACK.AND I KNOW SOME WILL SAY IT WAS A (RACES) THING BUT HES EVEN BEAT SOME WHO BEAT JOHNSON.AND IT WAS NOWERE NEAR THE HULKING,CLEVER,FAST SKILLED MAN THAT HAD FOUGHT 6 YEARS BEFORE.

I dont understand why jeffs speed and power is never mentioned only his size,even his skill to one refs amazement when the ref said (to my amazement jeffries was outboxing the master boxer corbett-you seen none of this in the johnson fight.how would he be rememberd without the comeback everyone pushed him into,he was even harrassed by his church. Someone mentioned jeffries saidhe would have even lost in his prime,he also said if he would have been in his prime the outcome might have been diff. and that if his head had been straight he might have whipped him that day,wither it was dehydration,poisen,heat or what- he said something was definatly wrong.But you cant go by the oldtimers quotes,they often said he would have wipped me or he was the greatist unlike todays big headed pricks they were overly modest.