I'm ok with Crawford saying 147 or nothing

Argue?? We're discussing the fight. If this is getting you angry, take a breather.

I don't give a damn about Haymon. YOU obviously take this personal for some reason, and are just ignoring any points made, as you've just made up your mind.

I've pointed out that guys can look better against a common foe then the one they are not as good as. Or better then. And you reply with nothing of real substances. At least have the balls to acknowledge your shortcoming in that point.

You want to only believe reasons you come up with, but for some reason cannot fathom TC was simply better. That's poor boxing knowledge and understanding. Low boxing IQ.

 

You aren't being objective. You're being obtuse and closed minded.

WTF is this 'certain color organization' BS? That's a childish comment.

 

You'd have a point if he hadn't already said he was going up to 154..................

 

Spence looked like he's never looked because he fought a caliber of fighter he's never faced. Levels make you look bad. Crawford deserves whatever credit he's getting because on the biggest night of his career he had one of his best performances. Period. We can make excuses all day fir every loss a fighter takes, but reality is Spence avoid TC so long for a reason that's clear now lol. And I'm a fan of both guys.....

 

I agree. If Spence had even made it remotely competitive in the fight, you could say the rematch makes sense. However, Crawford dismantled him so easily the rematch would be nothing like as big of a fight. And with Terence on the wrong side of remaining career he really needs to fight all the challenges out there right now, to cement his legacy.

 

Crawford needs to move on from Spence. Spence fanboys will always have the car crash excuse ready. Moving to 154 doesn't fix brain damage. Everyone is acting like that fixes the problems with Spence when everyone knows that when Crawford knocks him out there too they will all cry car crash again. Then you have the issue of Spence always getting what he wants. Spence spent years making ridiculous demands to Crawford even making him cross the street. Why is Bud obligated to give Spence what he wants the second he's no longer in the driving seat?

 

Ennis, Virgil, and Thurman would've beaten that version of Spence.

 

Because you guys have been overrating Crawford for years and he still has yet to fight a healthy prime fighter. You guys hate Floyd but there are no asterisk on his resume

 

It's 'COULD'VE'....

 

No they would, Spence was compromised that night

 

I'm one poster, not a "You guys". And I've been more a fan of ESjr then TC. Grow the eff up....

 

I kinda have an issue with it. Spence claimed he went out of his way to meet Crawford's many demands for the 1st fight to happen. If true, Bud's obviously taking advantage and wants Spence to have no shot winning (by not fighting at 154).

 

Whatever, you're a 'joker'....

 

Stop over hyping Crawford then. You claim to be one of the most objective fans on this board

 

This is why I don't understand you guys giving Crawford all this.crediy. we never gave Jones credit for beating Toney because we knen Toney was weight drained