Im picking Dzinziruk to beat Martinez

hmm... how can anybody pick a guy who was smaller as well as being at least 2 levels below in terms of class to a top p4p fighter like martinez?

unless, he was actually a fan of martinez in the first place and just wanted to hype up his opponent to make the victory seem more credible and significant than it really was. :think

 

Yet you made a full thread saying that Dzinziruk would beat Maravilla....therefore wrong, did you or did you not ?

 

Quit trying to be around the bush and just admit you ****ed up...nobody is trying to hear these lame ass excuses! You were WRONG...Deal with it!:rofl

 

Yeah great point ***, The Goat, 46-0, and yourself have a combined $2070 of the $3000 VCash you started with, obviously you hit em' for a lick. "Team Elite"...Lol, Lol, Lol, Lol, aren't you guys a little old for make believe, good try at an explanation though...If you would like to dip into my "delicious VCash total" in attempt to get a loan, hit me up and we can discuss the terms, but I'm pretty confident that I read one of you ***s, I believe it was Headgiver-Headbanger state definitively that $1000 VCash was required, to be in your "club"...sounds like you guys are on the verge of purging some "members"...pun intended.

 

This thread is a towering monument to bailey, the most perfect example of a douchebag that ever was.

Pure quintessence of douchebaggery displayed on page after page.

 

If someone wants to invest their money on a guy named Bailey and his predictions, so be it. For every Bailey out there that bet on Dzin, there were five and a half others that bet on SM. Hence, SM -550 Dzin +475.

Can someone please put up Bailey's win/loss record here? The fights that he picked both fighters, like the SM/Dzin fight, are obvious losers.

Bailey, you are not fooling any serious handicappers here with your "I conned everyone into betting Dzin because my word is like gold" theory.

Dzin started at +375 and by fight night he was +425. Your prediction on Dzin winning meant absolutely, positively and unequivocally nothing to the betting line. In fact, if anything, it made the betting public favor SM more.

Okay?

I looked at all the threads here proclaiming and justifying a Dzin win and at +425, i didn't even make a small play.

A +425 underdog and I still couldn't find value in Dzin.

 

dont get the big deal. i mean bailey was wrong. we are all wrong at one stage. dont see why he just doesnt admit it. ah well

 

This should be a tacked thread and a clearing house for all of Bailey's future predictions.

 

:rofl

 

:rofl

 

Bailey's a grade A ****...

 

this thread needs to marinate a little longer. The ESB community needs more time to digest its full significance.

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

This was never going to happen what a dumb thread !