Im picking Dzinziruk to beat Martinez

yes, that is the reason why i bet pavlik. normally, this is more evident as the fight goes on , the weight and strength disparity.

other than the knockdown, i had the fight even going into the ninth like lederman and steward.

Dzin's other disadvantage was his prior competition compared to SM's. that and it was his second time fighting in the US. some guys don't allow enough time for their bodies to acclimate to the time change.(eg.Lewis/Rahman 1).

 

i know one thing for sure, you do not have more experience that emmanuel steward when it comes to the fight game.

dwyer has been wrong as of late and it happens to the best handicappers. I have lost diego/kampmann(i had kampmann) and fitch/penn(draw,i had fitch) that both i should have arguably won. **** happens.

not respecting a Stanford JD shows just how ignorant you are to the intelligent people here. you may disagree with dwyer but to not give a "flying ****" about his academic accomplishments tells me you have little of your own.

also, you scored pascal/hopkins 120-108 pascal. well, i had pascal and thought he lost the fight. the only rounds he won where the ones had the knockdowns.

trust me no one, not even pascals mom, judged this fight 120-108 pascal.

you look really stupid right now.

 

atsch

Good God, you failed!!!

 

This content is protected

 

Listen you absolute cretin. I posted the Hopkins v Pascal score as something which is known in some parts of the word as a "joke". That's because I have a sense of humour, unlike you.

Wow, what a ****ing pea-brained muppet you are. :roflatsch

And sort out your appalling grammar before making judgements on other peoples' intellect. What a disgusting hypocrite. :dead:deadnono

 

oh, so now your 120-108 score is a joke? i guess you putting dirrell/AA on your "heart of glass" video regarding fighters with questionable hearts was also a joke?

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6o9Up1anffo"]www.youtube.com/watch?v=6o9Up1anffo[/ame]


only complete idiots that try and discredit emmanuel steward and people with stanford JD's would ever think that Dirrell was faking a cold-**** punch from a known heavy-hitter. a cold-**** that was loaded, set with leverage and delivered flush to the jaw to a completely unprotected fighter. i had dirrell in that fight and yes, i may have gotten lucky as dirrell appeared to be tiring as aa was coming on.

nothing wrong with my grammar. this is a forum and i am not writing a thesis for publication.

 

Dzin was a respected undefeated Champion of European origination. For a dimwit like Bailey who can't understand what he is seeing when watching a fight, whom relies only on a Rainman like devotion to sanctioning body rankings and box rec, it was impossible not to overrate him. Dzin's sin was facing an opponent as an underdog. Instead of sticking to the plan of fighting second raters and old men he stepped up and faced a legit champion is his prime. I commend him for not living his entire life without testing his limits but the beat down was inevitable. Anyone who bets real money on boxing saw this coming a mile away.

 

OK I'll bump it if you like. If you were half as smart as you think you are this nightmare thread wouldn't exist. You might want to watch your tone. Acting hard makes you look like an even bigger tool.

 

This post is like the Moby Dick of ESB, **** on baildumpster, posts. So for you viewing pleasure once again, and without further adieu:


Originally Posted by RobertV77 View Post
Dzin was a respected undefeated Champion of European origination. For a dimwit like Bailey who can't understand what he is seeing when watching a fight, whom relies only on a Rainman like devotion to sanctioning body rankings and box rec, it was impossible not to overrate him. Dzin's sin was facing an opponent as an underdog. Instead of sticking to the plan of fighting second raters and old men he stepped up and faced a legit champion is his prime. I commend him for not living his entire life without testing his limits but the beat down was inevitable. Anyone who bets real money on boxing saw this coming a mile away.

 

bailey and Robert are toe to toe and are really letting the leather go. Vicious uppercuts, stinging hooks, laser-like jabs. A whole array of punches on display in this brutal encounter. Who shall emerge victorious?

:bbb:vonnecunt:toneyartytime:lamaimp:klitfanb::nutcasewha:tta

 

why is this thread still alive

 

Two ESB guys with over 10000 posts each were gung-ho on Dzin. I saw the fight like yourself and Dwyer; Dzin had faced suspect competition and was not overly impressive when he stepped up. But the most compelling fact was that Julio took him competitively to the distance in Germany and then was subsequently KO'd within 18 months by two American fighters, at 154. I believed before this fight that SM was a true 160 after he beat KP, a career 160lber.

I love live underdogs and I didn't even have a small play on Dzin, saw no value whatsoever.

AA is a live dog especially at +500, essentially the same line as the Dzin/SM fight.