Cotto was in FULL retreat in the last three rounds of the Mosley fight. He wanted nothing to do wtih Shane...
Yea but thats because he whooped his ass in the early adn middle rounds so he wanted to protect his W.
floyd fans are either silently or fully supporting mosley on this fight knowing that if mosley beats pac, floyd would have no need to fight pacquiao and his vacation would be justified.
Can anything else be acceptable? If I think boxer A would beat boxer B than in reality boxer B beats boxer A. I have no choice but to give full credit to boxer B. My question for you is that if I'm right about this fight, will you give Mosley full credit?
Why is Pac even fighting someone whom Floyd DESTROYED? There's nothing Pac can do, even a first round KO, that justifies this fight. Mosley didn't even belong in the ring with Mayweather, so what changed? Nothing. More BS from the Pac camp why this fight is even happening. And how can *******s even try to this use this as ammo against Floyd fans?
The reason I asked is that there were countless of posters like you who picked Barrera, Morales, David Diaz, Dela Hoya, Hatton, Cotto, Clottey and Margarito jsut before the fight only to discredit Pac after the win for beating fighters that are shot, old, only come forward style, not black and slick, blah, blah, blah.
Mosley was one solid punch away from making it look like Mayweather did not belong in the ring with him..
You call a lucky punch belonging in the same ring? Sorry to say, lucky punches take no skill at all. FACT, Floyd never went down. If Floyd had gone down and taken a count, he would have recuperated faster. As it was, Floyd took over in the last 30 seconds of that round.
remember, he clinched hard too and never let go of shane. that bought him some time. i wouldn't consider it a lucky punch either, i think that was what shane's camp was gunning for, the overhand right. they probably knew that was their only chance. they didn't want to go the distance, no one's outboxing floyd for 12 rounds.