I'm saying it if it hasn't been said already. Clottey was paid to lose this fight.

atschatschatsch How many punches does Zab throw a round?

 

I don't think you have seen Clottey before, otherwise you would know he pretty much always fights like that.

Also I am not sure you actually watched the fight on Saturday night.

 

Jesus Christ is this for real?

Clottey was paid to lose? Dumb ****.

Even though I may disagree if you had said Clottey had poor conditioning, poor gameplan, too much respect for Pacs power etc I'd respect your opinion.

Answer me this, why, when Clottey did engage, was he trying to take Pacs head off? Or did you miss the uppercuts?

 

obviously... no need to ask.

 

I don't think that he was literally paid to lose but the Pacquiao camp knew exactly what they were getting when they chose Clottey as an opponent.:yep

 

*AT TIMES* being the key word.

I honestly think you give Clottey more credit than he deserves.

You act as if this is not the first fight he has thrown away because of his lack of offense.

If you dont smoke weed. . . then as an athelete. . I encourage you not to get hit in the head anymore

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl:roflatschatschatsch

Clottey's style is a peek a boo defence with a generally low punch output, he was tailor made for Pac.

And that is exactly what we saw. He couldn't cope with Pac's intensity, punch output, angles and speed.

I actually don't think you have seen Clottey fight before.

 

Nonothingjerome? yeah, because you're such an expert:rofl

So in your opinion Clottey had no intention in those uppercuts eh?

Attack the guys workrate, fear, inability, whatever, but to suggest he wasn't trying to hurt Pac when he did throw is ludicrous.

 

How would you describe Josh Clottey's style then?