I'm sorry but the more i watch Calzaghe, the more i see weaknesses.

:yep :hey :yep

 

:huh WHy doyou just lump anyone and everyone together?

I DID NOT back Kessler dip****. And sure, I can admit to thinking Lacy would win. But not based on any hype, Calzaghe had simply not looked that great before. And backing Bika? Go **** yourself little boy. I was on this site backing Calzaghe before you even heard of boxing mr. johnny come lately. atsch

 

The beauty of the quote is that it can be applied in more than one case.

Hopkins getting TKO'd would surprise a lot of people
Hopkins lasting the distance would surprise a lot of people
Hopkins making it extremely close would surprise a lot of people
Hopkins winning would surprise a lot of people

:hey

 

Calzaghe is not 6 foot 1, where the **** did you get that stat from, Enzo Calzaghe?

He also wasn't the first person to knock Eubank down, as you claimed in another thread.

What next, Calzaghe goes back in time and ****s Jake La Mottas beloved Vicky?

 

Well, we have to hear you talk about it now, because you went with the sentiment of Calzaghe by blowout for a while, which is what CHJ picked also.

 

Ive been meaning to ask.... CHJ seems to hang his hat of the fact that he ALWAYS picks fights correctly, but I noticed something today....he has zero vcash.

:think

 

Probably lost it on soccer, which he is a fan of also.

 

Or on Woods....

Sorry, admittingly, that was premeditated and planned....I couldnt help myself!!!!

:good

Seriously tho, like Brooklyn says....Hopkins is going to surprise ALOT of people.

:yep

 

edit

 

Nah nah nah . . . in that list the only thing that will suprise me . . . is if Bhops get TKOed.

Based on Bhops ring smartness, I'm expecting it to last the full route; I'm expecting it to be close and I'm expecting Bhops to sneak out a win. In fact a controversial one.

 

Well, that's why they fight...ANYTHING can happen:good

 

I won't be suprised if JC wins it either. :good

 

You are right, he has loads of weaknesses. No idea how he's undefeated for the better part of 2 decades. Just lucky I guess

 

No idea? Or just you don't like admitting that he's maybe only fought one or two GOOD fighters in his entire professional career...

He's not 6'1", shut the **** up. Everyone knows he is under 6'.

And YOU DO NOT KNOW ANY OF THAT ****. For all you know he will get beat as bad as Ricky Hatton did, then I'm sure UK apologists will just say "I'm not trying to take anything away from Bernard's performance but EVERYONE KNOW'S JOE ISNT A 175 LB FIGHTER."

You don't know any better than any of us how well he will do at 175. He may be stronger and more active, or he may be weaker an slower. You just don't know.

Man I just cannot believe the amount of BS surrounding this fight.

Calzaghe fans saying they are are pretty sure they expect Hopkins to be knocked out. YEAH RIGHT.

These are both facts, not opinions, FACTS regarding both fighters:

JOE CALZAGHE IS NOT A PUNCHER.

HOPKINS HAS ONE OF THE BEST CHINS IN THE SPORT, BUT WON'T GET HIT ON IT BECAUSE HE HAS SOME OF THE BEST DEFENSE IN THE SPORT.

Therefore, Hopkins is not getting stopped. Come on people, get a ****ing clue.

In their fight, Kessler connected with a higher percentge of his punches (30%!!!) than Calzaghe did (26%).

Thats correct. You were the only member of this entire ****ing forum that accurately picked Calzaghe to win the fight. ....shut the **** up

I pick Calzaghe to win the fight, but I seriously just cannot believe that so many people on this forum claim they think that it will be a dominant performance by either fighter, and especially that they think Joe Calzaghe will STOP Bernard Hopkins.

 

Most fighters have a weakness. No need to sour your puss. :hat