I'm sorry but the more i watch Calzaghe, the more i see weaknesses.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by klion22, Apr 14, 2008.


  1. Sebastien

    Sebastien Active Member Full Member

    889
    0
    Jul 18, 2007
    Had he fought 44 Bernard Hopkins, he'd be 0-44
     
  2. sambob

    sambob Active Member Full Member

    1,312
    0
    Dec 11, 2007
    "If you don't count Jones"

    What a great idea. I guess we aren't counting Toney either, or anyone else who has been a great fighter at 168.
     
  3. SAS2

    SAS2 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,173
    2
    Jun 24, 2006
    what! what! you ****ed my wife. I thought my brother did!:rofl

    or was it joe pesci...i can't recall:huh
     
  4. SAS2

    SAS2 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,173
    2
    Jun 24, 2006
    they all have said "I didn't think he was that good"....
     
  5. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    Bravo, fair pre fight comment!


    This content is protected
     
  6. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,761
    336
    Aug 4, 2007
    I find it funny that somebody bumped this thread but looking back at it, i think i was somewhat correct. I always contended that Hopkins' game plan would be to move on his feet like he did against Winky to nullify Calzaghe's workrate and try to catch him coming in with lead right hands and clinch or to come in with combinations and clinch. That's what happened. Of course, i wasn't sure he would do this but it was my guess.

    The problem is that Hopkins ran out of gas as the fight wore on. Something that is completely understandable as he's 43. But i still contend that if father time had not caught up to Hopkins, his punches would've been much more accurate and the lead right hand would've made Calzaghe more weary late in the fight. Hopkins' punches lost his accuracy as the fight wore on and that made Calzaghe more brave. That's a stark contrast early in the fight when he completely respected Hopkins' punching accuracy. Yeah, he had some moments late in the fight but he was at his best early in the fight. And that is usually the opposite of most Hopkins' fights as he usually does his best late in his fights.
     
  7. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,874
    Apr 30, 2006
    I always see the age excuse as to why Hopkins wore down, but nobody seems to be giving Joe credit for setting a pace Hopkins was uncomfortable with. It's not like the first time Joe's done that- a big part of what makes him tough is setting a fast pace and wearing down whoever's across from him with it. I don't think 2002 Hopkins would've coped with it any better than this version did.
     
  8. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,761
    336
    Aug 4, 2007
    I give Joe credit for pushing the work rate. So i think it's a combination of Joe's work rate and the fact that father time finally caught up to Hopkins in this fight. Hopkins was as fresh as a daisy in his fight with Winky and he threw about 200 more punches than in the Calzaghe fight while moving about as much. The difference was father time IMO. But Joe definitely pushed the pace. So i give credit to Joe also.
     
  9. stiflers mum

    stiflers mum Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,520
    787
    Aug 9, 2005
    :yep
     
  10. Maxmomer

    Maxmomer Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,373
    40
    Jun 28, 2007
    He does have many technical flaws, but is able to overcome them for the most part with his superior physical assets and ability.