yeah....a shot ass simon brown gets kod for the 5th time by a huge, in his prime puncher thats naturally bigger.....bad comparison
Duh it's the same thing! Im not saying the DQ wasn't justified or that Dirrell would of won. But my opinion was that Dirrell was acting those last moments. he was hit by cleaner, stronger punches. It's amazing how people are fighting for Dirrell over this shot, but was two very HARD punches by Margarito against Cotto, they never said anything.
That was a clean hit dude. Even if he possibly could continue but he was nearly out on his feet then why give Abraham that advantage? **** AA he deserved to lose that fight on that punch.
You dont fake involuntary muscle spasms, you dont fake crying because you think you've lost because you dont remember what happened. Watch the Hatton KO please. Breathing is exactly the same. No way Dirrell could have planned that.
Bad post from you actually. I was responding to the genius who says you don't move at all when you get kayoed. Now since you like to butt in... Did Simon Brown move his arms after he got knocked out???
That punch wasn't that clean, AA hit him harder through that hold fight. I agree the DQ was justified. Dirrell exaggerated that last moment if not acted.
Eze's pretty cool, I just think he's off on this one. I think its a case of if people want to believe Dirrell was acting then they'll see the "delay" as such. Comparing it to Hatton is a bit silly bc that KO was one in a thousand. I mean look at Alexander's KO of Urango a few weeks back. He didnt go down right away the 2nd time. Was he faking? When AA KO'd Taylor in Oct, his arm went up and stayed up, his head was off the canvas. And that was a brutal KO that required a 2 day stay in the hospital if memory serves. Point is, fighters react differently. Arthur Abraham's power is well documented. An flush, loaded, undefended shot to a guys face couldnt do that?
Bull****, eze. I remember you defending Campbell right after the fight ended. Which means you were convinced that he didn't fake anything without needing to hear the doctor's opinion. So I'm asking again. Why the sensitivity with Campbell, but not with Dirrell? Why do you "just believe" the one but not the other?
because Dirrel was going to the win the fight, because the DQ was justified either way, Dirrell exaggerated the moment. dirrell was going to win the fight if he had continued. campbell was partially blind. All I am saying is that Dirrell made that shot that he took way worse than what it was.