And top mma fighter fight....its more like orginal mma....in a cage...but no ref..no gloves...no mouth guard...no groin protection...and no clothing. Guys can bite gourge fish hook...tear off the genitals...whatever....how different does the fight look? (Ps men have to fight...if they don't they and their familes are tortured to death). Basically my question is..do guys still grapple when they have to worry about eye gouging? How about the stance....does it go back to more of a strikers angled stance when you need to worry about groin kicks?
Yea I can see the headbutts helping the ground and pound wrestlers...but still that can be controlled by a good guard.
it changes things considerably, its not mma at all at that point. eye gouging, head butting, small joint manipulation, ground stomps, and strikes to the groin will turn it into whoever uses these techniques more will have the advantage.
And of course headbutts where ok in the first view UFC's and other Vale tournaments. My big question is bites gouges and gental rips. Also groin strikes to a bare no protection groin would be very vicious.
Ive got a what if for you What if you took your trolling assed thinly vailed attempts to diss MMA fighters back to the lounge where your threads on Ass **** and Mike Tyson being your cell mate and wanting a blow job type malarky will be more appreciated.
Awwwww....are you're feeling hurt stoo. **** off you ******. And its a legit question...what stays and what goes in a anything goes fight. And I'm not dissing mma...I still think those guys would be best e able to have success...although I do think the no rules opens it up more. One "knock" on mma I guess you can get from what I am saying is the stance. I really do think the common mma stance is **** if you need to worry about kicks to the ball.
My feeling aint hurt, I was just asking a question. I realise your just a child with too much time and God knows what else on your hands
Pankration was like this. Everything except eye gouging and bitting. Many people died and it was considered an honor to die fighting. Funny enough, it was less dangerous than boxing at the time, which was done bare-handed and allowed every hand strike. A bunch of people died by having being disemboweled by a knife-hand to the gut in boxing, many of them no longer looked like humans after boxing. And yeah, it was better to keep it standing. Less likely to be stomped to death and kneed to the head. They were also naked, so there was a chance of getting the little children crushed beneath some guys feet. Going for an armbar is still a viable option, but only if you intend to break the arm before they bite your Achilles tendons off. It'd be a vastly different sport, to say the least.