IMO The biggest problem with the Klitschkos

Then let's hope those HWs will make it into the ring with either K brother and make it a good fight. It always takes two to tango :good

 

Oh great, another jealous Klit hating ****** thread.

 

There's no reasons they should swap opponents...What for?
So haters like you can **** on them about how there fighting eachothers leftovers. FFS when Wlad destroys Haye he'll get no credit for beating him anyways...I'm sure people will say he was to small, to green, overrated, etc (even British fans) to discredit Wlad's win.
Then people like you would complain that Vitali didn't destroy Haye after his brother did, by the off chance it might be more interesting? LOL!

Hardly any opponents for Wlad are competitive, and any opponents for Vitali are competitive. These 2 guys DESTROY (wether it be a quick KO, Wlad straight punching the guy to death for 8 rounds before the KO, or Vitali battering somebody for 12 rounds). Nobody wants to see that opponent who got demolished fight the other brother. You don't want to see that **** either if you were honest with yourself, but your a hater obviously so you choose to be blind.

As for there losses they have avenged those for the other brother. I don't mind...Makes two good fights.

 

It seems to me that the biggest problem that you have with the Klitschkos is that they keep winning.

 

:good


53-49-3
and
42-39-2

Must be tough for him to take.

 

As I have said before being boring is subjective. Americans might find them boring but not the Germans or Ukrainians. For example my friend finds movie with good plot, acting and amazing ending "The usual suspects" very boring. He would rather watch Transformers because it has a lot special effects, explosions and a hot girl. So it is not a problem with them it is a problem with you. I like Klitchko brothers but I hate transformers. I know that statement is an oxymoron:yep

 

Don't be hatin'.

My take is that how many of these guys get back from taking a horrific beating by one brother and then say "You know what? that wasn't so bad. give me the other one too."

Not to mention that the challenger is typically made to look horrible in the fight with a K bro. It would be hard to market them for a fight with the other one, because fans are always universally disgusted with the challenger's performance.

Example is Chambers. Spent the whole fight running away, then got knocked out by a seemingly innocuous punch. Who wants to see him fight Vitali just because he might do slightly better?

 

So which type fights don't you like? The "total schooling with the eventual, spectacular KO" like Wlad vs. Chambers or Vitali vs. Arreola or both vs. Peter?

You don't appreciate the quicker ones either like Wlad vs. Austin or Wlad vs. Brock. Vitali vs. Solis or Vitali vs. Kirk Johnson?

 

I'd be interested to see Klitschkos sometimes fight each other's already beaten opponents, but the division has more depth than people think and there are always better fights to be made. Put together a heavyweight top 20 and the most interesting and relevant fights to be made are ones that don't involve the guys that have had their shot.

Also, how many of them have earned their second chance? Thompson is decent but hasn't earned another title shot. Johnson certainly hasn't. I imagine the Klitschkos will avoid Solis after he already went into a Klitschko fight with a knee injury and spoiled things for everyone. Chambers, Arreola, Chagaev, JC Gomez... none of these guys are earning title shots. Haye, Adamek and Povetkin are all in a position to fight for a title. Helenius may be next if he gets past Peter. Then of course there are mandatories.