In 2009 What Is More Important, Belts Or P4P Respect?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by walk with me, May 26, 2009.


Page 2 of 2
  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,116
    48,344
    Mar 21, 2007
    The belts, out of those two things, if you are a fighter.
     
    McGrain, May 26, 2009
    McGrain, May 26, 2009
    #16
  2. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    P4P is just made up **** by Ring Magazine or boxing fans. There is no real substance to it.

    There are **** loads of belts that mean nothing in themselves, but if a guy starts to unify or beat good competition for the belts that gives it more meaning.
     
    TFFP, May 26, 2009
    TFFP, May 26, 2009
    #17
  3. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    I did.... now go check & see which one I voted.

    (God dam ****in hidden polls :twisted:)

    Ps. I voted for the p4p vote.
     
    Bill Butcher, May 26, 2009
    Bill Butcher, May 26, 2009
    #18
  4. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    when we had the WBA IBF WBC and WBO belts I think we still saw the belts as important. Once the 5th belt came up then how can you have the top 10 fighters in a division and half are champions? I recognized those 4 but none others. But the organizations have hurt boxing.
     
    MAG1965, May 26, 2009
    MAG1965, May 26, 2009
    #19
Page 2 of 2