In a close decision, u have to give it to the champ.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by st762410, Nov 14, 2011.


  1. st762410

    st762410 Member Full Member

    204
    0
    Oct 20, 2009
    After watching pac/marquez 3 i went public and expressed my disappointment. I felt like marquez won, hands down. But then i went back and watched it a second time. I gotta say....IT WAS A VERY CLOSE FIGHT. Neither pac nor marquez dominated IN ANY way. NOBODY WON DECISIVELY. Could it have gone either way??? Absolutely. It could have even been a draw. But if a fight is that close it has to go to the champ....that, being pacquiao. And if it was pacquiao that was on the losing end of a close decision, i would feel the same way. :bbb
     
  2. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    Or the "Home" fighter.
    (That has all the promotion behind him)
    Which is exactly what happened on SAT.
     
  3. Lunny

    Lunny Guest

    no no no, sir

    you score a fight round by round

    whoever has the most points wins the fight


    you don't wait until the fight is over and suddenly think 'gee willikers that was close! I'll give it to the champ!'
     
  4. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,133
    Oct 17, 2009
    If I'm not incorrect, the expression "taking it from the champ" meant that a draw was not enough to strip the champion of the title, and that only a victory would guarantee the championship. Even if winning rounds dominantly means taking the championship for you while scoring round-by-round, Marquez certainly did that for 7 at the least.

    Lots of people struggled to give Pacquiao four or five rounds, and six would be pushing it. There's no way he won 7.

    It's time for boxing fans to accept that a fight that isn't a complete shut out doesn't mean the awarded victor can be justified because the sport is "subjective." Close but clear, and not even really too close for most.
     
  5. bobotnaman

    bobotnaman ★★★★☆ Full Member

    3,884
    1
    Sep 8, 2011

    i think he meant, close rounds go to the champ.

    it's like,
    judge 1: holy **** that round was close, who will i give that round to?
    judge 2: just give it to the champ.

    lol
     
  6. unloco

    unloco Boxing Addict banned

    6,046
    8
    Oct 11, 2009
  7. punisher

    punisher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,534
    19
    Jul 16, 2010
    FALSE. Each fight and each round is supposed to stand on its own.
     
  8. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,943
    3,300
    Apr 26, 2010
    Possibly...but he's still wrong. Each round you either win or lose, period.
     
  9. megavolt

    megavolt Constantly Shadowboxing Full Member

    13,622
    34
    Dec 25, 2009
    Ding ding ding ding ding we have a winner
     
  10. bobotnaman

    bobotnaman ★★★★☆ Full Member

    3,884
    1
    Sep 8, 2011
    so no 10-10 round?
    some rounds were so close you don't know who won. so the judges could be thinking, "meh, pac's moving forward so ill just give it him".
     
  11. TerryESB

    TerryESB The Final Boss Full Member

    13,376
    434
    May 4, 2009
    Yeah thats the rule of thumb. You have to decisively defeat the champion to win the title belt.
     
  12. UpperCut2

    UpperCut2 Active Member Full Member

    762
    0
    Dec 2, 2009
    I hear ya, but that's "old school" BS. There is NO written rule anywhere in any boxing organization that state this as a scoring stipulation. Whomever outpoints the other wins, plain and simple...:good
     
  13. compukiller

    compukiller Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,428
    6
    Mar 4, 2006
    Then why didnt Marquez get the decision in the 2nd fight? He was the Champ in that fight. :deal
     
  14. boxingfanneato

    boxingfanneato what would MORALES do! Full Member

    2,850
    2
    Jan 2, 2010
    jermaine taylor-bernard hopkins???
     
  15. Danmann

    Danmann Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,427
    20
    Oct 30, 2011
    That bull**** about champ getting any decision started with Ali, when almost everyone he fought was getting robbed. There are no "Champ points" in a fight, they are supposed to score it as a fight, and give it to rightful winner.