In Andre Ward the new Joe Calzaghe?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by AnotherFan, Sep 25, 2011.


  1. AnotherFan

    AnotherFan Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,221
    2
    Dec 20, 2010
    Thank you for stressing my point. Ward is very likely to become the dominating smw for our era, as Calzaghe was during his.

    Comparing resumes can be very hard, since bias come into play. Wards best win was Kessler, and soon also Froch. Problem is Kessler lots to Joe, and Froch lost to Kessler. This put them in egual positions, if it where not for Joes win over BHOP. Wardos seem unable to understand this, since they think with their emotions, rather then their brain. But Ward has time on his side, and I defenitly believe he might surpass Calzaghes resume when it is all said and done.
     
  2. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,013
    3
    Jan 23, 2005
    Calzaghe only won a belt at one weight class.

    Magazine titles don't count (especially at LHW where they were awarded to the wrong man initially). :good

    And don't forget the WBO wasn't even viewed as a legitimate belt until the year 2000 or so.
     
  3. Arran

    Arran Boxing Junkie banned

    9,773
    3
    Jan 21, 2008
    Hopkins was lineal fool
     
  4. Malden

    Malden 006 Full Member

    14,631
    1
    Aug 18, 2011
    Thats open for discussion and interpretation :deal
     
  5. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,013
    3
    Jan 23, 2005
  6. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,013
    3
    Jan 23, 2005
    No, it was Zsolt Erdei at the time.

    Hill -> Michalczewski -> Gonzales -> Erdei

    Either way it's still not an actual title though.
     
  7. Arran

    Arran Boxing Junkie banned

    9,773
    3
    Jan 21, 2008
    hopkins was the man then and is still the man now.
     
  8. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    How far past prime was Eubank to you then?
    Eubank had lost a close decision to Collins, that many thought he won, had a couple of tune ups and rematched Collins to a SD, had a couple of tune ups and lost clearly to underdog Calzaghe. After that loss Eubank went up to CW and challenged world champ Thompson losing a very close decision and then rematched Thompson losing on injury when ahead. Thats Thompson who years later past his best KOd D Haye.
    Consider Eubank only had 2 losses to one fighter when he fought Calzaghe, the second by SD to a world champ and was 31 then went on to challenge a big CW flooring him etc, how past his prime do YOU think he was?
    Remember Kessler is Wards big win and was the same age as Eubank here and had around the same amount of fights, so is Kessler shot as well, because Kessler has a serious eye problems and was an unwell double vision suffering fighter who has been inactive for a while now due to his injury

    Remember when you make silly comments about losses was G Johnson considered past his prime when years ago after losing to Hopkins he went 7-9-2 including the Hopkins loss

    The WBO Belt
    I just wanted to highlight some details to you.
    The SMW divisions first world champs were WBC 1988, WBA 1987, IBF 1984 & WBO 1988.
    Now for a start it is a new division so no belt has any more prestige than the other as they were all started at a similar time. So the WBO SMW title has no less prestige than the others.
    Consider also that the WBO at SMW has been involved in 4 unification bouts.
    The IBF has been involved in 2
    The WBA in 3
    WBC in 4 also
    This shows that the WBO has been as willing to make top fights at SMW as much as any other governing body.

    Now look at the list of champs in each and who they defended against and you can see that the WBO SMW title has produced the best defences overall better than all of the other govening bodies in this particular weight division so far.
    Consider how much critism Bute gets now for his IBF defences.
    Consider M Beyer defending his WBC title against 26-14-5 fighter who was coming off of a win against a 0-2-0 fighter
    Or that Mundine when defending the WBA title against a 24-13-5 fighter who was the same fighter that WBC champ Beyer was defending against above.

    People bring up Eubank who helped mould the belt that was good enough to give T Hearns a slice of history making. Out of Eubanks 18 WBO SMW title fights 14 of those fights were against fighters who were, had been or became top 10 SMWs. One was a unification and another was against the undefeated former IBF SMW champ (relinquished his title). In fact 6 of the fighters he faced had been or became world champs

    Calzaghe also won the WBC WBA & IBF titles :smoke

    Magazine titles dont count, so that means that you think Hopkins has been campaigning at LHW for around 5 years before ever becoming champ. I agree magazine titles dont say a great deal but beating the top man does, and thats what Calzaghe did
     
  9. Malden

    Malden 006 Full Member

    14,631
    1
    Aug 18, 2011
    Thats more like it, but he was not the real lineal champ. But being "lineal" and being "the man" isnt always the same. Comeback Foreman(Beat Moorer yes, but then got a gift against Schulz) and Shannon Briggs(Getting a gift against Foreman) was lineal too, but calling either of them "the man" would be a joke.
     
  10. 1whites

    1whites Member Full Member

    460
    0
    Jul 31, 2011
    calzaghe is the most naturally gifted boxer i have seen, been trained by his mental old man in a shed on a field somewhere. And still bashed everyone up, imagine he got some world class training, he would have been frightening!
     
  11. MrPR

    MrPR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,197
    34
    Mar 23, 2009
    How you compare natural skill/Talent with someone who actually slaps .... so Dont Thank me for anything , This thread was already filled with stupidity the moment you decided to make it .
     
  12. AnotherFan

    AnotherFan Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,221
    2
    Dec 20, 2010
    Only Floyd haters are as dumb as Calzaghe haters. I came to realize this during the debate after Floyd vs Ortiz.

    While you write Calzaghe off, your hero Andre Ward mention him as one of his most importent role models within the sport. Why? Because Joe gets the job done, and that is the bridge between him and SOG. Ward, who is an excellent though rulebending student of the sweet science, understands this. But sadly enough his fans, commonly known as the "wardos" are unable to think in such complicated patterns.
     
  13. AnotherFan

    AnotherFan Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,221
    2
    Dec 20, 2010
    And to educate you further. Calzaghe is the one to get by thanks to natural talent. Ward is first and furthermost a master of the sweet science. As his fan, a wardo, at least you should understand that much.