....so let's discuss. You have... HIGHWAY ROBBERIES BAD ROBBERIES MILD ROBBERIES Going off those 3, list some yours accordingly...
I would only have two levels of robberies - "highway" and "bad" "Mild" robberies are those that seem like they're robberies, but in fact, due to the scoring system, they are not. Sturm-Macklin or McCloskey-Prescott would be recent examples of this.
Highway Robbery - Whitaker/Chavez, Holyfield/Lewis I, ODLH/Trinidad Bad Robbery - Pac/JMM II & III, Pac/Bradley, SSM/ODLH II Mild Robbery - Martinez/Williams I
"Highway to Hell" robberies are pretty rare, thank God...in my opinion, that'd be more like RJJ in the Olympics territory.
JMM-Pac trilogy is worse than Pac-Bradley. JMM III especially was a boxing master-class by an ageing pugalistic virtuoso against an opponent that had all the odds in his favour, speed, power, age, weight. And for the third time he was denied a decision that most thought he deserved, it was outrageous. Pac-Bradley was just a bizarre surreal ending and robbery after 12 rounds of the predictably better guy doing what he was expected by all to do. The scale of victory in Pac-Bradley was arguably larger, but the performance and surrounding circumstances in JMM III made it worse for me.
Oh, come on, man. You've got to be kidding me. III is the only one you can say is at least close to the level of Bradley-Pac. Pac won I pretty clearly, while JMM won II, but it was still a close fight. To me, Pac-Bradley was the equivalent of a high powered football offense not scoring as many points as usual against a solid team...but still winning the game easily.
Not sure you read the rest of the post bro. And Pac aint win **** clearly but that's another matter. And 3 robberies perpetrated against the same guy are worse than 1.
I did read it, and unless there is something cryptic in there, I get exactly what you're saying. Regarding I....yes, Pac won pretty comfortably. JMM did and excellent job of getting back into the fight, but him wining after getting dropped 3X in the 1st would mean he dominated 2-12, which he didn't. He mostly dominated, yes, but Pac had his moments, and those moment, coupled with round one were enough to secure him the win.
Haven't seen the fight in about 20 years but I remember Whitaker-Ramirez being about as bad as you can get.
:verysad Pac-JMM 1 and 2 were close fights that could have gone either way. I get what you're saying about the 3rd, though. Even though Pac's win over Bradley was far more convincing, the significance of a JMM win over Pac was much more. That, unfortunately, was taken away from JMM; thus making it a more painful robbery.
HIGHWAY ROBBERIES -pac/bradley BAD ROBBERIES - pac/jmm 3 MILD ROBBERIES -not sure about this one, maybe pac/jmm 2 falls into this category since I think jmm should have won but the KD help which is part of the scoring system(rules) to eventually have a case for pac stealing it
