In case Wardley beats Usyk with no rematch clauses, this could lead to...

I,m really not sure here : assuming usyk fights wardley , is this an indisputed fight or is this a wbo mandatory defence ? Or both ?

 

Fury vs Wardley is interesting. The thing that doomed Parker was how he’d just shut off when Wardley nailed him good.

Fury doesn’t do that. Need to knock him down or visibly have him out on his feet to make him stop. I think Fury would have handled some of those moments better than Parker did. And Fury would definitely have tied Wardley up rather than let him just tee off while covering up.

on the other hand, Fury gets knocked down easy. Multiple of those shots that sort of shut off Parker but didn’t knock him down would have put Fury on the canvas. He’d have got up, but getting repeatedly knocked down make a point victory difficult.

I’m not sure.

 

Yes. I even think Fury may come back now to face Wardley.

 

Wardley goes through Fury like a knife through butter. Will be 38/39 years old, shop worn, gets hurt every fight as it is, last thing he needs is somebody as unorthodox and powerful and game as Fabio Wardley in front of him.

 

I can imagine fury jumping at the chance to fight wardley if there is big reputation to coma with it.

If he loses it is his age. If he wins he is the king of the world.

And wardley is flawed enough and lacks experience, so fury might outbox him still.

 

Depends on how much Fury has left. Prime Fury clowns Wardley.