In his prime, was Michael Nunn a more talented boxer than Joe Calzaghe?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by DINAMITA, Jun 4, 2009.


  1. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    What do you think Classicfolk?

    :bbb
     
  2. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    36,579
    21,302
    Jul 29, 2004
    Probably in a more conventional sense.

    He was an amazing athlete but Joe had other intangibles that saw him succeed..Joe was a very impressive athletic specimen himself.
     
  3. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,518
    10,396
    Jun 23, 2008
    Yes. Nunn in his prime(when he beat Tate) was as talented as ANY fighter could be. Too bad he burnt out so quickly. He had the talent to be an atg.
     
  4. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,854
    10,064
    Jul 15, 2008
  5. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    86
    Sep 3, 2007
    Possibly, Nunn looked close to unbeatable at one stage.
     
  6. natonic

    natonic Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,581
    85
    Jul 9, 2008
    Agree with this. Nunn was more physically gifted but Calzaghe hold many intangible advantages.
     
  7. OBCboxer

    OBCboxer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,954
    230
    Jun 2, 2007
    Yes. He looked unbeatable in his prime and had a lot of talent.
     
  8. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,249
    5,939
    Apr 30, 2006
    Flashier, yes. More talented? Depends on how you define "talent". Being able to adjust and having a phenomenal rate of recovery and stamina are things I consider talent because they're qualities that 1000 fighters could work on the exact same amount and you'd be lucky to find 1 who'd match the level Calzaghe did them at, but everyone defines it a little differently. For my money, it's Calzaghe and that's who I'd bet on if they were to fight.
     
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,276
    49,670
    Apr 27, 2005

    I'll 3rd you guys. Intangibles, sooooooo important yet sometimes so hard to see. Time often tells.
     
  10. ray fredrickson

    ray fredrickson Member Full Member

    470
    0
    Jan 7, 2009
    Simply: NO,No NO No means NO!!!!!!!! If he was he would be where Joe is!!! Christ sake Pete Rademacher was where Joe Frazier was GOLD MEDAL<what did he do with it !! SOcietal bull**** aside NO, NO NO NO NO NO !!!!!
     
  11. natonic

    natonic Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,581
    85
    Jul 9, 2008
    I think it would be easily argued that Nunn was one of the most gifted Middleweights ever. He lacked Calzaghe's Focus, determination, discipline, and on and on. Calzaghe is clearly the better fighter from an ATG perspective because of these qualities.
     
  12. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,205
    53,655
    Feb 11, 2005

    Yup.

    And don't forget Joe's other talents, hand speed, foot speed, almost preternatural judgement of distance...
     
  13. Ischbaad

    Ischbaad Active Member Full Member

    1,012
    0
    Dec 4, 2008
  14. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,973
    13,342
    Apr 1, 2007
    Far more natural skill and ability, whether you want to talk about how far beyond his opposition he looked or just his physical tools... Yes to both.

    Of course Calzaghe had far more drive and determination. But Nunn at his best had people as excited as Curry did, people were gushing about him.
     
  15. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    139
    Jul 6, 2007
    Definitely. Calzahge, never really got to show how good he was or wasnt, because he never really faced the fighters he should have. There was fights with Jones, Toney, Micalzewski, Hopkins, all that Warren avoided, and kept him fighting garbage.