In terms of overall p4p career greatness - FRANKLIN or BELFORT?

Discussion in 'MMA Forum' started by horst, Jul 23, 2011.


  1. horst

    horst Guest

    Who do you rank higher in all-time terms and why:

    Rich Franklin or Vitor Belfort?

    :bbb
     
  2. jimmie

    jimmie Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,706
    1
    Jul 19, 2004
    Probably Franklin even though he was brutal KTFO by Belfort. I just think Franklin was more consistent at both weights in his career, won the title in a more convincing matter and held onto it for a few fights. Belfort has some good wins Couture, Wandy, Lindland, Franklin, Herring and a few others but nearly every big fight he has lost. Franklin has Liddell, Wanderlei, Hammil, Okami, Tanner 2x, Louiseau (big win then), Ken Shamrock at a time when it was a decent win.
     
  3. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    Franklins win over Shamrock was never a decent win.
     
  4. horst

    horst Guest

    What's your answer to the question at hand Flea?
     
  5. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    I'd say Belfort for sure. His win over Wandy was very impressive, and he's been fairly solid throughout, fighting bigger guys early on. Belfort has the better attributes as well IMO, Franklin has always been very workmanlike in his approach, which is good but Belfort is just the 'better' man IMO.

    With respect to Jimmie, he contradicts himself a lot in his analysis. He says of Belfort that 'every big fight he has lost' and yet Franklin was massacred by Anderson x2, Belfort destroyed him, and his best single win is over a shot Iceman (lovely shot mind)

    He also lists Hamill amongst his best wins. :patsch

    Neither fighter is a true 'great' IMO but both have been very useful for long periods of time.
     
  6. Will Cooling

    Will Cooling Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,170
    0
    Aug 2, 2010
    How the hell was Belfort's win over Couture good? Jesus christ.
     
  7. Stoo

    Stoo Obsessed with Boxing banned

    25,846
    2
    Apr 4, 2008
    Beat me too it again fella :lol:
    But it's a good question, Id have to go for Belfort. To trot out 'He hasnt fulfilled his potential'' cliché he still has some damn fine wins, relatively speaking
     
  8. Primate

    Primate Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,833
    6
    Nov 16, 2010
    Could be argued either way.

    Looking at their losses, Vitor lost handily to Randy x2 (and has one freak win), lost to Sakuraba, Ortiz, Liddell and Overeem x2. He also has a lopsided loss to Hendo and a KO at the hands of Silva.
    Franklin only loss in his early career was to Machida, then Silva x2 then a close split to Hendo, then kod by Belfort and UD'd by Griffin.

    Overall neither of the guys have any really embarrassing losses. Franklin has certainly looked more consistent, but since he lost the title he's been hit and miss, arguably because his competition has been of a consistently high level. Belfort's performances go up and down, motivation/mental issues, whatevs. When he's on he is ****ing on, but he crumbles when he's in a bad head space.
     
  9. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    Exactly. Their first fight is far more reflective of both mens abilities, Vitor getting a hammering.
     
  10. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    Good post.
     
  11. jimmie

    jimmie Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,706
    1
    Jul 19, 2004
    WTF are you :patsch at Hamill ? Is it because he is deaf ? The man is alot bigger then Franklin and has beat Bisping(**** the judges), Jardine and Tito and he beat Tito pretty damn easy compared to others. Matt also went the distance vs Rampage yet Franklin lit him up for 2 rounds before stopping him in the 3rd.

    Also I dont believe I said Belfort lost every big fight I said nearly every big fight besides the Franklin, you can argue Wandy was a big fight in 98, Couture if you wanna count it and now im running out of fights. Franklin won and defended the title 3 times and any title fight is a big fight so you add those with his wins over Liddell, Wanderlei (big fights regardless) and even Okami. Franklin has lost a few big fights but hes almost even in that area.
     
  12. Vitor Belfort

    Vitor Belfort Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,334
    3
    Dec 17, 2008
    I like belfort but he didn't dominate as a champion as long as franklin did so i gotta give it to franklin.
     
  13. horst

    horst Guest

    ATG fighters like Big Nog, Sakuraba, Shogun, Crocop and Hendo didn't have long dominant reigns as champions, that's not the be all and end all. If that's your only reason then you should maybe look a little deeper.
     
  14. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    35,621
    12
    Jul 19, 2004
    Belfort. He is a very significant fighter who's been around since the dawn of MMA.
     
  15. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    Exactly.

    He also has a win over ATG Tank Abbot :hey