In the end Pavlik will be a bigger star then Hopkins

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Vincent Gottschalk, Oct 21, 2008.


  1. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,098
    2,732
    Jul 20, 2004
    Jones vs Hopkins II would make A LOT of money and would be a mega-event, that's something everyone will agree with and easily. You might not appreciate these legends and call them "**** heads" but in reality boxing does appreciate them and needs stars like them, not frauds.
     
  2. pauliemayweathe

    pauliemayweathe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,995
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    Do any of guys really think that Hopkins vs Calzaghe 2 or Hopkins vs Jones 2 will be more action packed then Pavlik vs Rubio, Pavlik vs Duddy or Pavlik vs Abraham?:hat


    so Arturo gatti and micky ward are the 2 biggest stars ever?
     
  3. Vincent Gottschalk

    Vincent Gottschalk Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,020
    4
    Feb 16, 2005
    Oscar lost to Maywearther and he is a bigger star because his fights are more action packed. The Fans want to see slugfests action! it not just if you win it how you win that packs them in. Hopkins has always been a parasite in boxing getting fights with guys like Trindad, De La Hoya and Pavlik who have real followings as opposed to handful of boxing purist who like Hopkins garbage way of fighting:deal
     
  4. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Pavlik's a bum and he got exposed..and no amount of crying will make that suffering suckatash talking lisp spitting, big headed dinosaur brain Hey Boo-Boo talking appear good against anyone who can box. Yeah, Hop the jail bird beat up Exciting Pav. Yeah, your boy might be out of boxing in a year if he faces Abraham. When AA beats PAv, is Abraham going to be called a terrorist when he ko's Pav?:rofl
     
  5. Vincent Gottschalk

    Vincent Gottschalk Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,020
    4
    Feb 16, 2005
    Pavlik beat Taylor who can box, and after all Taylor did beat your boy the Jail Byrd:yep
     
  6. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Yeah, and that jail bird hurt your wittle feelings by beating your hero lol. Nobody believes Taylor beat Hop anyway lol. What you are saying is, yeah, you beat me up the other day Nallege, but the day after, I saw that guy beat you up so there!:rofl
     
  7. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    The only thing I disagree with is that Pavlik is a bum. He's no bum mate.
     
  8. Vincent Gottschalk

    Vincent Gottschalk Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,020
    4
    Feb 16, 2005
    Taylor beat Hopkins clearly both times:bart Hopkins did jack **** in most of rounds of those fight.:nono
     
  9. Vincent Gottschalk

    Vincent Gottschalk Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,020
    4
    Feb 16, 2005
    Tisk Tisk and all the while when guys truly should get the hype like Chad Dawson are left out in the cold. Oooooh the in justice of it all it makes be want to cry:dead ............:yep
     
  10. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    Clearly?
    I think you didn't watch the fights closely.
    Taylor has a case for the first fight, but most people felt Hopkins deserved the nod in the second one. So no, one can't say Jermain won "clearly".
     
  11. Ziggy Montana

    Ziggy Montana The Butcher Full Member

    3,605
    0
    Oct 3, 2007
    Wow that's ****ing ingenious. Are you only aware of this notion of economics known as INFLATION?

    B-Hop turned 26 in ****ing 1991, that's 17 years ago.

    Back then the price of gas was half its current level, bread costed 1/3 of what you need to pay nowadays, the national wage index in the USA doubled since 1991, the highest paid baseball player in 1991 was Darryl Strawberry at 3,8M, now it's Jason Giambi at 23,5M...

    Getting the picture? Stupid question, of course you don't...
     
  12. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    A bum in the sense that he has no true boxing skills. Like a bum has no money or little money, PAv has little to no skills when fighting the best. This doesn't mean he can't fight, it means that against guys with skills, he is a bum compard to them. It's just boxing talk.
     
  13. CarlesX7

    CarlesX7 Shit got real! Full Member

    13,209
    291
    Sep 23, 2008
    Yep. Too bad Taylor got so much hype from HBO and others and that backfired when he got beat by Pavlik.
    Jermain is very likeable and has good skills imo.
     
  14. Vincent Gottschalk

    Vincent Gottschalk Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,020
    4
    Feb 16, 2005
    Hey this was 2000 when Hopkins fought Antwun Echols I remember clearly Hopkins being such whiny ***** about fighting for only $200,000. Hopkins was a nobody before the Trindad fight:nono
     
  15. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    You keep on embarrassing yourself PAv fan lol...keep on embarrassing yourself lol...