Inconsistent judging

Reminds me of lennox v Holyfield
Usyk did win though so it doesn't matter

 

The scoring in this fight was spot on; Fury got some gifts in the first fight.

 

This content is protected

 

116-112 3 judges all usyk?

 

You keep telling yourself that

 

Shut up mate, your posts are embarrassing. Doesn't matter if it was 7-5 or 8-4 Usyk, he won the fight. Deal with it.

 

I actually thought both fights were very similar minus the knockdown in the 1st fight. Usyk simply took over in the 2nd half of the fight just like he did the 1st time.

I actually had both fights 8-4 for Usyk so I didn't see much difference honestly apart from the 2 point round in the 1st fight.

 

First fight should not have been a split.

 

People weren't that outraged when Joshua won a card 115-113 vs. Usyk which is actually insane. That fight was Usyk 10-2.

 

You shut up you fecking ***** if you think usyk won than that 116-112 all 3 cards you are embarrassing

 

115-113 Usyk or Draw.

 

If you think 116-122 all 3 cards to usyk you are embarrassing

 

I don't think this fight was closer.

Fury dominated a few rounds the first fight and then won some razor thin rounds. This fight you can't even pick one dominant Fury round. He never even had Usyk hurt.

There were clear Usyk rounds. Usyk hit the harder shots. Despite no knockdown Usyk boxed him better this fight.

 

I think people were just relieved that Joshua was only gifted one corrupt scorecard rather than two.