Infighter VS Outboxer who wins this fight matchup and Why??????AneAdviceIs Apreciated

Wat.

 

Yeah. It depends on way too many variables. That's like saying who wins, a team with a good passing game or a team with a good running game. :huh

 

Don't waste my time again.

 

The boxing rock paper scissors theory:

Boxer > Slugger > Swarmer > Boxer

 

Yes, it's just a really stupid question lol. No offense, it just is. Infighters often beat outfighters and vice versa. Hell, there's almost no fighter in the history of fighting who never fights on the inside (or vice versa).

The answer is as follows:

Whoever is the better fighter. And that's not even always true :bbb

 

Everyone has views on it, a lot of the great fights show the boxer winning. People behind the style show smarts, faster feet and anticipation, smart training usually with a good technical idea of boxing. Boxers straighter punchers aswell so the punches get there better. But it is still a ying and yang kind of thing.

See Ali-Frazier trilogy. Lately Khan V Maidana was a good match up showing the differances between the styles.

 

I wouldn't really call Madaina an infighter, he's more of a slugger imo.

But the guys before have pretty much given you the answer - If an outfighter can keep the distance he should win.

-If the infighter can close the distance he should win.

..It's just a matter of who manages to make their style/gameplan work. Of course this is without even considering attributes such as endurance,speed and strength

 

Without video how can anyone know?

He could have done any number of things - slipping, footwork, bulldozing through.
We cannot answer this question for you.

 

I have a sparring partner who is much taller and heavier, and I am unusually strong but a little sloppy at times for my size. I think he can beat a wider variety of opponents than me, tall ones, short ones, heavy ones, fast ones, because he has a great outside game, but I sometimes think I have his number because I know him so well. Your offensive pattern might just be predictable to this guy - his reflexes and accuracy allow him to know what you are doing and to counteract it. A pro might be able to dissect your tendencies after half a round.

With my friend, I know he blocks the jabs and tries to counter the right hands with his left, that if he is pressed with the left hook to the body he will usually move into the range of my right hand, that he uses the ropes to come off with a straight right, becase I have seen him fight SO MANY ROUNDS. I counteract everything he does by not using my right hand as much as I do against other guys and keeping him at bay with a low jab, stepping across his left and consistently attacking his body, but never pressing him too hard on the ropes even though he is taller. I've had some flawless sessions with him because his habits are so familar to me now even though he is sharper and more coordinated than me, and I would feel comfortable bullying him even though he is forty pounds heavier than me, too. ie - I put him where he is weaker and I am stronger, even though he might be a better fighter than me with all kinds of physical advantages and a great outside game.

 

Depends on the fighters.

Infighter - If he can not eat shots, cut off the ring, and keep up a high work rate.

Outfighter - If he can keep moving, keep his jab in the other guys face, and make the other guy pay when he moves his hands from his face.

A slight tweak of speed, power, stamina, fighting pattern, etc... can tip it either way.