O my lord, old fogey. you actually brought up losses against folley and machen when they were 100% washed up. how could a honest man like you stoop so low? most of them refused to fight him he was too big and fast LOL none of the euros dared entered the ring vs liston. henry cooper said he feared two men, rocky marciano and sonny liston. cooper wouldnt fight liston. are you serious about the mildenberger loss? eddie machen was 100% shot when he fought mildenberger. the very fact u bring this loss up means your grasping at straws. this loss doesnt count for anything. the only euro machen ever lost too near his prime was johansson. did u really bring up the london fight? dear god, folley was more shot to peices than a bulls eye at 50 yards. this loss doesnt count for ****. folley was wayyyy gone. folley was past his prime i think 33 years old was it when he drew with mildenberger, certainly a prime folley would have had his way with him. folley in his prime outside of the controversial cooper loss(which was brutally avenged) pretty much dominated the euros I see how you left out nino valdez, who pretty much wiped out the entire european border guys like neuhas sys erkstine london richardson etc all were brutalized by valdez.
Joe Louis went 0-2 vs charles and marciano, wuts ur point? you took losses from folley and machen when they were far past there prime
1. "Are you serious about the Mildenberger loss? Eddie Machen was 100% shot when he fought Mildenberger." Well, he was 33 and past his best, but he would hand Jerry Quarry his first defeat later that year. You make much of Liston's defeat of Valdes, but Valdes was a year older in 1959 than Machen was in 1966. Yes, Valdes did defeat London after losing to Liston, but London was never in the same class as Quarry. The main point is that Machen was ko'd by Ingo and beaten by Mildenberger. Hardly shows domination over Euroheavies. 2. London was 33 years old himself in 1967. He never won another fight. London was at least as deteriorated as Folley. The main point is Folley split with Cooper, drew with Mildenberger, and lost to a fading London when he himself was growing old. Hardly shows domination over Euroheavies. 3. Valdes did do well against Euroheavies, but the Neuhaus fight was in 1953, the Sys fight (and Sys was 41 and washed up) in 1954, Cockell in 1955, Richardson in 1956, Erskine in 1957, and London in 1959. These men were not only largely from an earlier era. but were clearly inferior to Ingo, Cooper, and Mildenberger. Anyway, Valdes was ko'd by Machen and was also beaten by McBride, both victims of Ingo. I just don't think Valdes is very relevant to a discussion of the abilities of Ingo, Cooper, and Mildenberger, who dominated the Euro heavy scene from 1956 to 1971.
Louis did not dominate Charles and Marciano. 1-7-1 can not be ignored. If you want to maintain that despite their failures, Machen and Folley and the other American contenders were dominating their European contemporaries, give evidence.
pop in the film of machen vs frazier right around the time he fought mildenberger. machen in 1966 looks slow as molasses, his reflexes are shot, his movement is gone. he is a shell. pop in the tape of a late 1950s machen he looks far better. machen was a old 33, he really was way past it by 66. machen looked horrible vs patterson in 64. the fact eddie was able to beat a young quarry despite being way past it is an incredible achievement. once again, how could you possibly count the mildenberger fight? machen was all washed up, he looked horrible by 1966 i mean horrible. badly declined. london was not a good fighter in the first place, so theres not much more he can deteriorate. if you watch folley vs ali, folley is fatter softer much slower than he was in his prime but he still gives ali problems. folley in his prime 1950s was far better than brian london could even imagine to be. folley forgot mroe about boxing than london would ever know. folley was about 36 when he took on london, he was way washed up. I thought folley went 2-0 vs cooper, knock down and outbox. easy 2 round kayo over cooper in rematch. folley was 100% washed up when he fought london, doesnt even count. you bring up mildenberger once again, he seems to like taking on these guys when they are way over the hill. folley like machen was pretty far over the hill by 64, its quite clear on the film. yet mildenberger still did not beat him. mildenberger? i dont think he was very good. he beat a washed up eddie machen in a meaningless fight, and drew with a far past his prime folley. what did he do? he is a decently skilled southpaw, but hes medicore in most areas.Dick Richardson knocked out karl mildenberger in one round. valdez williams and dejohn all easily beat richardson. Nino Valdez pretty much dominated the entire european heavyweight scene of the 1950s. he knocked out joe erksine in 1 round. joe erkskine twice beat henry cooper. cooper and mildenberger were pretty much journeyman level talent fighters on film. if thats the best you got, perhaps the euro scene was worse than we thought. Ingo was good, but thats 1 very good euro fighter from 1955-1970. There were at least a dozen very good american heavyweights from 1955 to 1970.
my evidence is outside of ingo and one controversial henry cooper win that was avenged, no european heavyweight was able to defeat near prime versions of folley, machen, liston, patterson, williams and valdez. most of the euro scene never made it into the top 10 ring magazine rankings. my last peice of evidence is film. outside of ingo, all the other euro heavyweights of that era looked extremley average, i mean very average. Nino Valdez pretty much dominated the entire european heavyweight scene of the 1950s. he knocked out joe erksine in 1 round. joe erkskine twice beat henry cooper. Dick Richardson knocked out karl mildenberger in one round. valdez williams and dejohn all easily beat richardson.
1. " Valdes, DeJohn, and Williams all easily defeated Richardson." True. Valdes stopped him in 8. DeJohn and Williams beat him on fouls. Cooper ko'd Richardson twice and Johansson ko'd him once. Richardson was a second-level Euroheavy who upset Mildenberger. One of those things. 2. "Valdes ko'd Erskine in 1 round. Erskine twice defeated Cooper." This is true and his one round ko of Erskine is one of Valdes' biggest wins. You do overlook that Cooper when he matured ko'd Erskine three different times. Cooper was better than Erskine. 3. "Cooper and Mildenberger were pretty much journeyman level talent on film." Your judgement. Cooper sure looked like a journeyman when he had Ali on the floor. Of course, if Liston had fought Ali he would have . . . well, we'll skip that. Mildenberger lasted 12 against Ali. Now if Liston, ah . . . we'll skip that also.
"Mildenberger? What did he do?" Mildenberger holds wins over Jimmy Slade, Harold Carter, Young Jack Johnson, Alonso Johnson, Wayne Bethea (2), Billy Daniels, Eddie Machen, and Big Train Lincoln. He drew with Zora Folley. All these men were ranked in the Ring Magazine top 10 at one time or another. "There were at least a dozen very good American heavyweights from 1955 to 1970." No one is arguing that the Europeans man for man were better, at least in depth. I am just pointing out that the list of contenders you gave--Folley, Machen, Williams, Bethea, Valdes, did not dominate the to Euroheavies, Ingo, Cooper, and Mildenberger. On the contrary.:bbb By the way, it seems strange trying to dismiss Folley's draw with Mildenberger or loss to London as Folley was ranked #5 in the yearly Ring rankings in 1965 and #2 in 1966. Folley was the #1 contender when he entered the ring against Ali in March, 1967. He won two subsequent bouts before fighting London in November.
hey pontius why dont u all tell us how ernie terell kayoed cleveland williams . far too many non americans on esb.
"My evidence is" Folley's win over Cooper is actually the only win Machen and Folley had in 5 bouts with Ingo, Cooper, and Mildenberger. Even taking out Ingo, their record is 1-2-1. They did not dominate as you said they did, and I do not have to flip results or dismiss poor showings by the Euros to make my point.
when did mildenberger face machen and folley when they were even close to there prime???? folley and machen were way over the hill fighters by the mid 1960s. as far as im concerned mildenberger fought in a different era than folley and machen. henry cooper was blasted out by floyd patterson and zora folley in under 5 rounds nino valdez whom you dont even rate as one of the best american heavyweights of that era, destroyed the entire european heavyweight scene during the 1950s.
1. I will repeat for the last time that I don't think Valdes is very relevant because his major wins (Neuhaus and Cockell) were in the Marciano era. Yes, he beat Richardson (stopped by Cooper and Ingo), Erskine (stopped three times by Cooper and once by Ingo) and London (beaten 3 times, including a 1 round ko, by Cooper), but none of these men were the top echelon in Europe. 2. I specifically stated that Ali and Patterson showed themselves better than the top Euros. Why bring them up again. My point is that the mere contenders did not. 3. Folley was a very polished and skilled fighter. He was in fact highly rated when he fought Mildenberger and would remain so for at least two years. Machen was still good enough to beat Quarry and to this point had only lost to top men. 3. I of course think Liston would have beaten the top Euros. Williams is more of a pig in a polk as he not only did not defeat most of the top Euros, but most of the top Americans. Check the list I compiled of Mildenberger's victims. Notice that most of Williams' biggest wins (save Terrell) were also beaten by Mildenberger. 4. My point with Marciano-Frazier on the other thread was that Harold Johnson should have been on the Liston era list. He was talked up as a serious opponent for Liston when Liston was champion. Valdes is a much stronger candidate for the Marciano list, in my judgement. The fact is all, or almost all, ATG defeat top fighters from the previous generation, such as Liston defeating Valdes.
A random slip-up of the mind as evidence for too many "non americans" on the board. Great comeback. Since when did this become a nationalistic issue anyway? Ingo's accompishements are very impressive, whether you think he's a "euro bum" or not. Even Liston didn't like him !