Interesting Article on Pac & Drug testing

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Emeritus, Feb 25, 2010.


  1. brettchko

    brettchko 4th deg bk. belt Full Member

    1,475
    0
    Oct 9, 2009
    agreed!!!!!!:good
     
  2. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    Pacquiao has never rejected a blood test by the commission. If they chose for him to have blood taken 20 days before a bout, he's proven that he would do that.

    Anyway, if this test comes back clean then theres no reason at all to suggest Pacquiao is dirty any more.

    Interestingly, if Mayweather had accepted the fight in Texas, he would have got his own way in regards to the tests. Pacquiao has no issue giving urine samples.
     
  3. OPBF

    OPBF Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,821
    0
    Oct 25, 2008
    Sparring partners are sparring partners. There's a difference between beating the crap out of your sparring partners and fighting a fighter in the pro-ring.
     
  4. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    Yeah, the point about sparring partners is ridiculous. When Pacquiao fought Cotto, the best sparring partner he fought was a shot Castillo. Pacquiao could have flu and would still batter this version of Castillo and look good, so his performances against sparring partners is not indicative of how he would against Clottey if he had blood drawn the day before.
     
  5. TheJuggernaut

    TheJuggernaut Hitchslap Full Member

    7,253
    105
    Sep 29, 2008
    Borat, when did I say he was unbiased about everything but this? Never said that, Im just saying that he comes off as purely unbiased, which isnt true for anyone. Everyone has some kind of bias
     
  6. Borat

    Borat Member Full Member

    136
    0
    Sep 13, 2008
    I see your point, I just never noticed Vivek's bias against Pacman. In fact he was singing him many praises. Now, all of the sudden he is completely against him. I just think it his view that Pac is hiding something here, that's all. And honestly, if you think without bias, let's forget the names and look at facts. We have a fighter who does not want to take a drug test 24 days from the fight, which would bring him 40 mil dollars, claiming it weakens him so much, and yet turns around and takes non-drug test 19 days before fight, for much less money. Look, forget the names, but isn't it obvious something is wrong with this picture?
     
  7. chesh

    chesh Active Member Full Member

    677
    0
    Jul 2, 2006
    Why would any self-respecting person feel the need to prove they are innocent of claims made by a convicted criminal??
     
  8. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    hahaha that's not an article. It says "hmmm" in the title.

    That's just a blog post.
     
  9. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    I'm not a drug user and I would categorically refuse a drug test if it was forced upon me.
     
  10. nick dio

    nick dio Member Full Member

    206
    0
    Aug 24, 2009
    The point is some of us just can't accept the fact that Pacquiao is this good, that he's beating the crap out of these greats, that he'd end up beating all these greats. For me, at least, I'll enjoy this phenomenon 'til he lasts, phenomena come but once in a lifetime!
     
  11. Doc (aka Meke)

    Doc (aka Meke) Active Member Full Member

    1,369
    5
    Oct 19, 2007
    no you don't... you see what you want to see... to reinforce your own opinion. so does vivek.. people who don't agree with vivek (and you) on many things see the problems in his/your reasoning immediately...
     
  12. Borat

    Borat Member Full Member

    136
    0
    Sep 13, 2008
    Well, you were required to take a drug test anyway and you agreed to that. You are just being asked to take a different more modern one. You are honestly saying if a company hired you and offered millions, you would refuse a drug test that is more sophisticated than the one that is typically administered by most firms? Be honest.
     
  13. Borat

    Borat Member Full Member

    136
    0
    Sep 13, 2008
    I see the facts and I am applying reason as opposed to licking balls of any of the fighters. Forget the names. What is not reasonable in this statement: "We have a fighter who does not want to take a drug test 24 days from the fight, which would bring him 40 mil dollars, claiming it weakens him so much, and yet turns around and takes non-drug test 19 days before fight, for much less money. Look, forget the names, but isn't it obvious something is wrong with this picture?"
     
  14. kukoy

    kukoy Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,404
    0
    Jun 13, 2006
    Yeah, sparring is the same as the real fight.

    Give me damn $1000/draw, I'll take it every other day.

    psychological man, psychological...
     
  15. Doc (aka Meke)

    Doc (aka Meke) Active Member Full Member

    1,369
    5
    Oct 19, 2007
    do we really need to explain it? try to put yourself in his position - there is a guy who publicly accuses to dope although there is no evidence whatsoever, and then tries to force a dope test on you that is not a standard procedure in boxing. What would you do? Any man with a bit of pride would say "no way, **** off"... 19, 24 days... who cares, you just don't want to do it when the other guy wants it and you do it whenever YOU yourself want it. Is there anything unreasonable???