Interesting quote on Joe Louis from Billy Conn trainer Johnny Ray

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Apr 20, 2012.


  1. greynotsoold

    greynotsoold Boxing Addict

    5,304
    6,457
    Aug 17, 2011
    I think he was probably correct. But it is a trial by fire and it is very possible that you'll get nailed. I think also that this is true of not only Louis but of Marciano, or Armstrong, or any other talented, mentally strong hard-working individual that commits himself to a particular style. It becomes very hard, if not damn near impossible, to beat them at their fight.
    That, I think, is what led very ring smart guys like Walcott, Charles, and Moore to try and fight Marciano inside. You aren't going to win running away because walking you down is what he does.
    With Louis, my thought is that maybe his methodical movement and style suggested slowness to some, and the first Schmeling fight led them to believe he could be outfoxed. Billy Conn was fast and smart and he nearly pulled it off.
     
  2. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    260
    Jul 22, 2004
    OK revisiting the fight now on 1 of those Marvin Cavandish boxers vids with modern commentary. Interesting points - it was a catchweight sub-200lb limit, Conn's hero was Harry Greb, Conn's mother was suffering from cancer

    Well through the early going he was using plenty of lateral movement, sticking and moving and picking his punches and using a very good defence. The gameplan was certainly not to 'TAKE HIS OPPONENTS PUNCHES'

    He potshots by setting up the angle for the lead right (similar to Schmelling) and has a the left hook lead, sets traps and uses angles to take advantage of Louis coming forward in straight line. He uses footwork to set up counters and generally pulls the trigger on any lapses in defence from Louis. He does throw in combination and steps back out, I suppose that's the only 'fighting hard', in boxing you always have to get an opponents respect so yes he does that. General keys to Conn's dominance were his quick half steps to control distance and quick countering at angles. In effect a boxing masterclass, although it must be pointed out it wasn't as 1 sided as generally remembered, Louis had his moments, especially to the body

    In round 12 Conn really ups the tempo and hurt Louis. In round 13 Conn starts flatfooted and Louis manages to start to land clean hurtful leads, this wasn't a case of Conn exchanging but I think Conn actually punched himself out a little and used his steam up in the 12th. He no longer had his defensive abilities because he was tired. Fighting against a man 30lbs heavier just took all the air out of him

    If I was going to compare it to another fight I'd compare it to Mayweather-Corrales, Louis obviously better than Corrales though

    Either way I wouldn't say it's the strategy that Ray alludes too
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,852
    45,604
    Mar 21, 2007
    Obviously, the strategy isn't "Take his opponents punches." Wtf man. The strategy he describes is "making him fight every minute of every round." If you take this absolutely literally I would have to agree that this it isn't "the strategy Ray alludes too."
     
  4. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    260
    Jul 22, 2004
    "You guys have got it all wrong. You don't box Joe Louis. You can put all the boxers you like in front of him, and he'll find them. No, you need to fight Louis. You need to fight Louis every minute of every round, you need someone who can take his punches and give him some back. That's how you beat him."

    Well ok, fine, but Conn did what he did on pure boxing. He would have done better if he could spoil inside or grab a breath here or there and pace himself better. Getting his opponents respect and not keeling over the first time he got hit is obviously essential but it was pure boxing.
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,852
    45,604
    Mar 21, 2007
    Nah, totally disagree, the existing footage doesn't support your position and every ringside report disagrees with you. This is NOT what "pure boxing" looks like.

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMrpJGndqg0[/ame]

    He's in the pocket in the first seconds and he's in range for most of the second half of these highlights. This is a "fighting retreat" married to a much more aggressive fight.
     
  6. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    260
    Jul 22, 2004
    So Mayweather isn't a pure boxer either by that definition?
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,852
    45,604
    Mar 21, 2007
    This content is protected
     
  8. Chinxkid

    Chinxkid Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,096
    4
    Apr 28, 2008
    Ray knew what he had, a fast, mobile fighter who could hit. Billy's speed got him there, but it was his power that held Joe off. Billy fought such a smart fight, but it was David holding off Goliath. What a great fight.
     
  9. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    260
    Jul 22, 2004
    McGrain put some shades on that make Conn look darker, you'll see allot of his techniques have allot in common with Mayweather
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,852
    45,604
    Mar 21, 2007
    I have no idea where you're getting this from. Or where you're going with it. If I had to guess, I would say you've claimed in the past that Roy Jones could beat Joe Louis and the trouble Conn gave Louis is the proof. But with these shades on i'm working in the dark.

    "Conn did what he did on pure boxing."

    No. He did not.
     
  11. timmers612

    timmers612 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,018
    414
    Sep 25, 2005
    The spring in Joe's legs is what has always stood out for me in the Baer bout. I don't think one would be far off in saying the best Joe could be was on display that night.
     
  12. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    260
    Jul 22, 2004
    Yes he did, I've put forward my reasons why, if you don't have the knowledge to debate, then fair enough but why start a thread asking for opinion?
     
  13. greynotsoold

    greynotsoold Boxing Addict

    5,304
    6,457
    Aug 17, 2011
    What, exactly, is "pure boxing"? To me, it is a guy that can move and fight from a distance, or fight effectively inside. He can punch with both hands, is hard to hit, can fight effectively going forward or in retreat. In essence, can do it all.
    Conn did that in the Louis fight.
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,852
    45,604
    Mar 21, 2007
    There's really nothing to debate i'm afraid...Conn spent huge swathes of the fight in the pocket and most of the fight in range. If you think that's a definition of pure boxing, that's fine, we are in total agreement and there is nothing to debate. If you think pure boxing means he didn't fight in the pocket and in range you are completely wrong as attested to by footage and every eye-witness account without exception, and again, there is nothing to debate.
     
  15. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    260
    Jul 22, 2004
    Fair enough, I do think it's pure boxing for the reasons I highlighted above, I don't judge strategy/tactics just by range, he obviously did fight in the pocket but used angles, used his defence and importantly didn't stay there too long except in the last round

    I don't think the catchweight was an issue as Louis was weighing similar weights in other fights