I scored both rounds for Hopkins. He was controlling the pace, landed the cleaner shots and landed more of them - the only thing of note from Chad was a combination on the ropes towards the end of round one. Worse for Chad Hopkins always gets better as fights progress. In my mind *if* Hopkins was acting he's got no one to blame but himself in this case.
You better tell this guy that http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?p=10978691#post10978691 http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?p=10978124#post10978124 http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?p=10978675#post10978675 Not only was Dawson winning he was 'Dominating'
Wow I guess it's true people really do see what they want to see!!!! That's nuthuggery taken to new extremes!
Hopkins was having problems , but no more than against Pascal first fight. Dawson was winning the first 2 rounds.
It was to close to say either guy was winning but you could make a case for Hopkins winning the 2 rounds.
Had it up 1-0 for Bhop. But Chad was leading the second before he showed his true colors. I guess people who had it 2-0 must be Bhop haters
Very clear rounds for Dawson, especially the 1st. It isn't even that Dawson did anything particularly impressive - he just kept working the right jab while Hopkins did nothing (except dive in with a few missed shots and push down on him). Literally nothing. Landed more of them? :huh Dawson landed more right jabs (again, not even a whole lot) than Hopkins landed anything.