Irrefutable proof Jones and Hopkins ducked Calzaghe in their prime

He wrote Jones was a prime atg when he was destroyed by Tarver and Johnson.
He called Jones and Hopkins Ameribums, which means in one contri he wrote they were prime ATGs. Then in another he wrote they were bums.
He wrote Joe wrecked boxing legend Chris Eubank Jr.
He wrote that Hopkins and Jones dragged Joe up in weight. How could Jones have dragged JC up in weight when Jones had been fighting at lightheavy for years?
That's 4 just in this thread alone. He is a repeat offender proven liar.

 

Hopkins has a glass jawatsch? Really? Well, Joe didn't knock BHop down, but BHop knocked Joe down. You know, the same BHop whose record at lightheavy is 9 wins 3 losses 2 draws/no contest at that weight (not including his debut fight which was a loss at 177 pounds) with NOT ONE KO VICTORY there. I am most certainly NOT a Hopkins fan, but he does not have a glass jaw. Yet another lie from the General's top liar.

 

From the masses standpoint Hopkins and Jones Jnr are considered ATG's, I speak merely from a broader perspective than my own, I would debate this based on them both being roided to the eye***** and fed sanitation workers,welterweights and fellow Ameribums like big time joke James Toney. I consider them bums next to Calzaghe because they had no right to be in the ring with them other than to prove to the world what we saw shot, old brittle boned Joe do.

They did drag him up, RJJ and Hopkins are naturally SMW, the roids changed them, they had the chance to face him at his optimum weight and refused.

Joe did a number on boxing legend Chris Eubank, why is this even disputed? Eubank acknowledged it and it was a classic fight between two boxing legends.:deal

 

When Segundo Mercado an Ecuadoran cigar sales rep puts you on your ass, your chin is in question.

 

You are such a degenerate liar and have been exposed as such on this thread. Jones may be considered an atg from what he accomplished in his career, but you wrote on more than one occasion that Joe beat the prime atg version. Jones was either shot or not that good in the 1st place because he was knocked the **** out by Tarver and Johnson, neither of whom were better than good. And in the rematch Jones lost AGAIN to Tarver. If you are going to write that a prime atg can lose TWICE to Antonio Tarver and once to Glencoffe Johnson, then you are either a degenerate liar or just insane. Well, maybe you're a degenerate alcoholic, but whatever it is, you're not writing the truth. Here is another question that you are going to refuse to answer honestly: if Jones was a prime atg when beaten badly by Tarver and Johnson, do you rate AT and GJ as atg elites, because according to you, they beat a prime atg in Jones. As far as Bernard Hopkins is concerned, his record at lightheavy is 9-3-2(outside his debut loss at 177 which would make his lightheavy record 9-4-2) and has NO KO VICTORIES at that weight. Bernard might be considered great due to his longevity, but he clearly is not a great lightheavyweight. As far as Joe and Chris Eubank is concerned, Joe never fought JR. Like you wrote. Please continue to lie and make a fool of yourself.

 

I note that Clinton has mustered a pathetic ''80'' profile views since joining in 2009.
I am upwards of 4,000 which did plateau I admit, but simply due to inactivity and the shocking decision to remove profile pictures which impacted greatly, I would probably have achieved 100k profile views but for that, I suspect Clinton would have been stuck on a mere ''80'' which denotes his credibility on this forum.

 

80 profile views :rofl:rofl:-nutatsch:rofl

 

Obviously you didn't know that that fight was held in Quito, Ecuador, which is over a mile above sea level. Anyone not accustomed to fighting at that altitude is at a sever disadvantage. In the rematch, Segundo didn't knock Hopkins down.

 

80 is a nice number, I like it. That doesn't change the fact that you are a degenerate liar and are repeatedly proven as such on this thread. And you refuse to honestly answer the questions that have been sent in your direction.

 

Not even a Cuban cigar rep but an Ecuadoran one, and you're defending that atrocious mandible scaredas::rofl:rofl

 

You can't even deal with the truth. I don't like Hopkins, but he certainly didn't not have a bad chin. Whereas, you are a degenerate liar.

 

Everything I have said is irrefutable, look it up, it is based purely on facts from a completely objective viewpoint.

I laid bare the appalling careers of Hopkins and Roy Jones Jnr, they are the blue print for Andrea Ward today, time has been kind to them as we ignore their PED abuse, their mismatches with welter weights and public servants, but when you study what they did, Hopkins looks much better but still isn't fit to tie Enzo Calzaghes shoelaces:deal

Your profile views are utterly pathetic, hang your head in shame for no-one respects you, you have virtually no profile views, no job, no prospects and no money, you may aswell put yourself down for a fight against Andrea Ward you fit the profile he likes to fight yep:rofl:rofl

 

+1 my man. You may be a degenerate liar, but you're our degenerate liar :arran

 

Much of what you wrote is irrefutable lies because you are a degenerate liar. And you have been proven as such on these boards. And you have refused to answer legitimate questions when pressed. On more than one contri on this thread, you wrote that Jones was a prime atg when he fought Tarver and Johnson. Then you called him an Ameribum on the same thread, different contri. You are a degenerate liar that has 0 credibility. Say bye-bye to your credibility:hi:.