Is 80-20 purse split in favour of Peterson a fair deal?

He seems to be pushing for this rematch really hard but did not care about rematching Prescott at all.
Does that mean he did not he could win vs Prescott?

 

"We were both winners in that ring because we both put a good performance on and I really think the fight was that good it will be one of the best fights of the year, again." Amir Khan

"I can't take anything away from Lamont because he was not the referee or the judges, he just did what he had to do and put on a good fight. "Amir Khan

how is that disrespecting peterson, khan brings 80% of the viewers and biggest paycheck for peterson at 140

 

60 - 40 peterson is fair.after all he is the champion..hell 70/30 is fair aswell only if there was no rematch clause tho

 

who gives a ****, its not our money! i cant wait to see the rematch, FOY imo

 

This is fair. That will allow Lamont to receive the extra 10% to offset his huge upcoming tax and expense bill so he can take home a good chunk of change.
Plus let's be honest here. The rematch is only going to happen because Peterson is a great guy with high morals and standards. Had it been Khan, there would definitely be no rematch cause he's a ***** and lacks Lamont's standup character.

 

What a ridiculous suggestion! 60-40 in favour of Petterson. Khan has to take a hit this time

 

i dont give a **** if neither get 0, i dont benefit from it.

 

Try to get in the mix and get a job like holding the spit bucket or something. All champions love having a jester around to laugh at. :yep