Look at pbf haters thinking canelo fought a prime pbf when he was faded and in his 5th weightclass and outweighed by 17 pounds in the ring. Not one of them even have the minerals to say canelo fought the best version of pbf because they know how stupid they look.
Teo wasn't green he can run hot and cold look at his performance against sandor Martin then look at his performance against Josh Taylor look at his performance against nakatani then look at his performance against commey. Look at his performance against loma then look at his performance against kambosos. He runs hot and cold more than any boxer in the sport today.
I am asking you about title fights set at a catchweight. I was specific about that. Hearnd and leonard were the Superbowl. No one cared about belts in that. Canelo was NOT drained to 152 because he could not make 147. It was always going to be for the JrMW unifications. Floyd had not been stripped of his JrMW belts he got from Cotto. This was a JrMW Title unification bout. And Floyd was a two time JrMW champion. Understand? Doesn't matter how tiny you think he was. All Floyd had to do was drop his JrMW belts prior to Guerrero. He kept those belts you say he doesn't care about. And signed to unify BELOW the JrMW limit. BTW, Canelo entered the ring at 165, not 170. Look, you don't like excessive weight gain, I get it. No one does. But a LOT of boxers do that. Hell, MOST do that. Maybe not that much, but most gain a lot of water weight. And it's not always beneficial. So, back to the question again, you are fine with title unification, or even title fights like Canelo v 3G at 155? If TC had insisted at 145 for ESjr, you'd be fine with that? You were fine with Oscar imposing a limit for his MW fight w/ hopkins? If Canelo insisted Benevidez needed to make 165 for a fight, you'd be fine with that?
Ahhh... so Leonard/Hearns was the Superbowl, but record setting Floyd vs. Canelo was... *crickets. That's an inconsistency, Lance. Floyd Mayweather was not a junior middleweight. He was a welterweight who entered the ring and took belts from junior middleweights, but he never regarded himself as a 154lber and never even bothered to try to weigh in at the limit. He was too small. I would understand Canelo asking for a catchweight of 165 for Benavidez if he'd consistently weighed at 162-163 for his fights at 168 (essentially the scenario with Floyd/Canelo) and challenged Benavidez on the way up. That ship has sailed. Canelo is a full fledged, beefy 168lber now, so the comparison isn't entirely legitimate. I would've loved to have seen Ward/GGG at 165 for Ward's belts. Or Hopkins/Jones at 170 for Roy's LHW titles. I just want to see the fights. If both fighters agree to the terms, I'm gonna sit and enjoy the show.
You know damn well the logistics of PPV are different today than they were decades ago. Leonard v Hearns was on another level then ANYTHING we have for a while now. Don't play this game. And you SHOULD know that. Hey, guess what, Floyd sold more PPV than Ali. I guess you would say Floyd is more popular than Ali ever was? Right? Because of PPV buys. He was a two time JrMW champion. Read that again. TWO TIME JRMW CHAMP. That is all that matters. Not his size. 6 years prior. 6 YEARS...he fought Oscar at JrMW and Oscar weighed in at 154. And he sure as hell didn't drop his JrMW belt he won from Cotto, as stated already. OK...so this sums it up. You don't give a damn. All you want is fights and don't have the integrity to suggest title fights be at their allowed limit, or at the very least, if ONE guy doesn't want to make the limit, his opponent should be in title fights. You are fine w/ stacking in favor of the cash cow or more popular fighter with pull. You're just a glorified casual.
Just to take the pi$$ even more, Floyd’s JMW belt was on the line against Canelo. “Oh, he wasn’t a JMW though”
Let's be real: You didn't know that SRL and Hearns fought at a catchweight. You didn't know that Tommy Hearns put his titles on the line and didn't cry about it. You didn't know that SRL was also an active champ at 168 when he had requested the catch. It was identical to what Floyd did, but.... Superbowl! You have no real argument here, and you might actually be the casual. Yes, I would rather see the fights than sit here and debate with people like you about how they shouldn't have happened.
I didn't cry about it?? The fight was 30+ years ago kiddo. AND I saw it live on closed circuit back then. Were you even born then?? You going to tell me what I do and didn't know now?? You came off like a smart ass about Floyd v canelo's PPV sales... *crickets* I pretty much spelled it out for you. You just have no proper retort or reply. BTW Hopkins fought Tarver at the LtHW limit. Why would he need 170 against RJJ?? I never said they shouldn't happen. How's you're reading skills? SOME OF US just believe title fights, and especially UNIFICATION fights should NOT be at a catchweight. In fact MOST POSTERS HERE shared that sentiment before Catchweights got more popular for title hopping money chasers. Hey, no need to get your pantie's in a bunch. You're just being petty and can't form a proper reply to what I posted.
Maybe the Alzheimer's has set in, then? Why didn't you fold your arms and complain 30 years ago, instead of watching a faded out SRL and Hitman go at it in their "Superbowl" matchup? Yup. It turns out that most people paid to see that fight because they actually wanted to see it. Guess they were all casuals... ...Superbowl? Hopkins moved out of 160 at the tail end of his career. There had been discussions -for several years- of him and Roy meeting at the middle when Hop was at 160 and Roy was at 175. You are a casual. Admit it. Hey, I think that you are in the minority based on the PPV numbers, but you are entlitled to your own opinion.
Oh gee, I meant to log on this site and post about it, but unfortunately, you know, ESB didn't exist in 1989. Darn. And good try. But the weight wasn't cared about in the rematch because people wanted to see them again regardless. Even with both passed their primes. Were you even born when this fight occurred? I never said anyone who saw the fight was a casual there Mr. ReadingSkills. Try understanding context before posting like an angry child, K dude? You understand how analogies work? You sure aren't up to par with reading comprehension skills for some reason with the way you reply. Yes, I was well aware of that. What killed the fight back then was not weight, but money. This doesn't even apply to what I posted. Are you even READING anything, or just assuming what I am saying and going of what you make up in your head? BTW, MOST PPV buys for fights of this magnitude are casuals. They make up a brunt of sales, not die hard fans. But I'm sure you knew that. You keep trying to call me a casual now, yet I'm the one who thinks Title fights and unifications should be allowed at their limit.
BTW Steverino, when Mikey Garcia moved up two divisions to fight ESjr, he didn't demand a CW. When Manny moved up two divisions to face Oscar, he didn't demand a CW. When RJJ jumped from LtHW to HW, he didn't impose a limit for Ruiz. And with Hopkins, he jumped up TWO divisions for Tarver. No CW needed.
Right... right... "Superbowl". LMAO The "weight wasn't cared about" because people wantes to see the fight, JUST LIKE MAYWEATHER/CANELO. Just how dense and disingenuous can one be to deny the obvious box office success of one fight while excusing another fight of identical scenario, because "Superbowl". LMAO Meh. Meh. You know why weight didn't kill the fight? Because Roy was actually willing to agree to the catchweight. If they had fought, would you have watched?.... Did you pay to see Mayweather/Canelo? Did you stream it?