Is ali the only boxer in history to be great while losing his biggest asset

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by quintonjacksonfan, Jun 28, 2007.


  1. quintonjacksonfan

    quintonjacksonfan Active Member Full Member

    1,334
    1,110
    Jul 21, 2004
    In the 60's his biggest strength was his legs. When he came back in

    the 70's he only got up on his toes for spurts and he was not nearly as fast

    How do you lose your biggest asset and still defeat Foreman,Fraizer,

    Lyle,Foster,Patterson, Shavers, Young,Quarry,Chuvalo,Jimmy Ellis,Norton,Bonavena?

    That's why I think he is the greatest boxer ever. When RJJ and SRL

    lost their legs they started to get knocked down and out by average

    fighters. When SRR lost some of his legs he was inconsistent

    for every great fighter he beat he also lost to them. IF PBF continues

    to fight when his legs are not their he will lose to average fighters too

    My question what other fighters have been able to beat the best while

    losing their biggest strength?
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,912
    47,910
    Mar 21, 2007
    It's an interesting thing to say - but I would dispute that Ali lost his greatest attribute. Having said that, we never would have known about his greatest attributes (heart, incredible durabilty, chin and smarts) if he hadn't lost his foot-speed - I think it's a fair point, therefore.
     
  3. Bill1234

    Bill1234 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,314
    499
    Jan 28, 2007
    No. Larry lost his jab's speed (it was still great nun the less). He also lost his footwork too. So he just sort of danced or moved around in spurts too. He beat Ray Mercer by counter punching and slugging it with him.
     
  4. groove

    groove Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,056
    26
    May 16, 2006
    No other heavyweight has ever moved around the ring like Ali did in the 60s. He was so graceful and light on his feet - it was astonishing to see for a man who weighed over 200 pounds. Ali lost his main asset but he also had other great assets aswell - speed, intelligence, adaptability, will power etc. Good post.
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,912
    47,910
    Mar 21, 2007

    But Ali's achievments post-loss are enough to label him an ATG without supplemental brownie points for pre-loss. Can the same be said of Holmes?
     
  6. AREA 53

    AREA 53 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,466
    83
    Apr 10, 2006
    Ali Had so much Speed to begin with that in losing some, his 70's incarnation was still Very fast when he wished to turn it on, see his pre and post fights with Chuvalo for some sleight comparison, one must bare in also that a younger Ali was fighting guys like Cooper, London, Williams, Folly, and the Older Ali had to Cross swords with Younger faster fighters like Frazier, Bugner, Quarry, Norton, ect Ali may of lost some speed but maturity probably made him stronger, A Ring General who knew how to marshall his changing forces,
     
  7. Bill1234

    Bill1234 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,314
    499
    Jan 28, 2007

    Yes. Not as much, but still yes.
     
  8. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,031
    25,096
    Jan 3, 2007
    I don't seem to recall Holmes " slugging " with Mercer. Although it's been 15 years since I've seen the fight. The only real exchange that remotely resembled slugging in that fight, occurred in the first round, and sent Holmes reeling. After that, Larry utilized the jab, and took full advantage of his reach and speed against Ray, who even being 10 years younger, was noticably slower than his veteran opponent.
     
  9. Bill1234

    Bill1234 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,314
    499
    Jan 28, 2007
    The full fight is on youtube. Larry was slugging with Mercer in a couple of rounds. He was also counter punching. In the first round Mercer caught Holmes with a great jab right on the chin while Holmes was backing up, and it sent Holmes reeling. That wasn't an exchange.

    Here is part 1, you can find the rest.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8zsnFsVuro
     
  10. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,031
    25,096
    Jan 3, 2007

    Okay,

    Well a couple of rounds maybe, but that's not what I remember happening for MOST of the fight.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,912
    47,910
    Mar 21, 2007

    List the fighters that Holmes beat with his weakend jab that condone your view. Thanks for posting that video, I enjoyed watching that.
     
  12. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,604
    290
    Apr 18, 2007
    An awful lot of champions who became renowned as skillful and stylish boxers started out as huge punchers whose hands couldn't withstand the force of repeated hard impact. Tommy Lougran may be the outstanding example of this, although Jimmy McLarnin also had a distinguised career.

    Some would argue that the foremost asset of Bobby Chacon during his original rise to prominence was his legs. He was no cutie though, by the time he had his last title run, and Schoolboy closed out the last few years after the Mancini bout as a winner (retiring Art Frias in the process).

    El Flaco Explosivo had been a slip and counter boxer-puncher, but towards the end of his career, he devolved into a get hit and counter type. Still, he got the job done more often than not.

    To become a champion, and remain one through a year of title defenses, Hilmer Kenty lost his stick and move style by choice, to become an aggressive stalker, an elective loss which served him well while at the top.

    Many fighters have adapted to the loss of size and strength advantages they enjoyed in their original weight classes. Duran has to be the classic example of this.

    George Foreman evolved so completely over 20 years that I count him as two different incarnations.

    There are other examples too numerous to mention, but I'm sure the others on this forum can identify plenty of them.
     
  13. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    Joe Calzaghe was known as a stoppage specialist going into his fight with Robin Reid, with a ridiculously high stoppage % and had just scored a KD over Eubank in round one.

    From there on though Joe's hand became increasingly brittle and problematic.

    Unlike Ali however, despite losing his ability to continue doing what he best known for, actually improved as a fighter. Joe became a masterful boxer and developed a somewhat unique style, which he demonstrated perfectly against Jeff Lacy in 2006.
     
  14. unitas

    unitas Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,062
    768
    May 12, 2007

    did you just call calzaghe a great fighter?????????:yikes
     
  15. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    Good point but not really. Louis lost his spark but still got great wins like Walcott 2!

    I would say that Ali and Louis are two guys who lost a major element in their game but generally still reigned king. Great fighters could do it. Like Holmes, he lowered his punchoutput, maintained his workrate, paced himself, stuck with the jab etc He wasn't 40 thinking he was 20. Hopkins is the latest to do it. He is 42 and fights like he is. Hopkins didn't quite pull it out against Taylor whereas I think Ali and Louis in dire moments pulled out a few.