Is Anthony Joshua a hall of famer

That's what's called a false equivelance a fallacy so to speak.
So no I don't accept your twisted logic. Please show me at any time in the history of the sport where the equivelant of 4 Charles Martin's won belts in the same division.?
Your talking complete bollocks G Man.
Joshua beat Martin. Vlad and Parker to get his belts. Your trying to tell me that Wilder beating Stiverne is miles better?
GTFOH I'm done with talking to you as you're full of shite.

 

Technically speaking you woukd beat 4 lower top 10 guys and somebody else couod beat the top 3-4 HWs in the world.
Hardly undisputed.

 

It hasnt happened nor I said it did.
I said technically speaking it could happen.
I didnt say Wilder beating Stiverne was better than those 3 wins.Stop putting words into my mouth.

 

Ranking don't determine the champ....the belts do. And I understand what you are saying. But you can't reinvent rules because of something weird like that (Which lets be honest, will never be the case...so sorta moot)

 

I disagree.

 

OK..which ranking then? Ring? Boxrec? Every ABC that has different top 10s?

 

I only use the Ring and TRBB.

 

You get that, IF this happened, the lucky recipient of the undisputed crown, would be ranked higher after the fact, then all the rest.

 

Then why mention it in the first place?
You're literally just making crap up as you go along. All because you can't accept Joshua being a former unified Champ despite having 4 belts. Your using fallacy arguments simply vecause you refuse to accept reality.
I can't help you.

 

Ok.
Can you accept the reality that that Unified Champ was never The Champ?

 

Dude...this makes no sense. Vacant belt fights happen in boxing, have happened for decades, and WILL so long boxing is around. I know posters here think winning a vacant belts means they suck for whatever reason... but that's the game sometimes.

I mean, your scenario presented will NEVER happen. BUT if one guy got lucky to fight for 4 vacant belts...he still won the belts, beating possibly 4 guys. Is not that worthy?

 

It is.

 

No one said he was "The Champ" again your moving goalposts after being dismantled and now making things up.
I never said he was The Champ I said he was a unified champ which he was. The Champ implies a singular meaning one until it's undisputed there is no "The Champ"
Do you understand?
Your frst post that I responded to implied Fury and Wilder were the Champs which I then corrected you and we have had a circular conversation because you refuse to accept the facts.

 

If an undisputed champ retired w/ all the belts... making them all vacant, that would be something. Can't recall if that's happened the last 20 years. But it's certainly a possibility I suppose. Maybe Fury will do that before calling it quits