Is there a difference? ¨Fanboys¨ are the only ones who'll step up and defend their fighters when other people are talking trash. They're the ones who follow their every move and support everything they do. Those who you'd call ¨normal fans¨are lazy to do any of that. neutral -¨Hey, look at those Floyd haters dissing Floyd¨ normal (lesser) fan - they are wrong, but meh, whatever.. REAL Fan - ¨wtf!? wait here im gonna teach those ***gots a lesson¨ *engages in a long discussion and flamewar with Floyd haters* In short, fanboys are the REAL fans I dont know who you are, but going by your username you probably thought Trinidad was the 2nd coming when he was around, and you probably think Cotto deserved a draw against Mayweather. that's how being a fan works
I disagree, imo fanboys are irrational clowns, in a league of their own because of their lack of impartiality. real fans are hardcore, as opposed to casual.
Yeah - I would have thought most boxing fans enjoy Manny's raw power and punching volume and people love watching Floyds accuracy and defence People are 2 quick to jump on you if you say who you think will win I am a fan of both, seen them both fight live and for the record I got Floyd winning a fight between the two
He's a whiny douchebag that thinks he is a lot better than he really is. Basically I was on the fence about him, until after his HBO interview after the Peterson loss, that hissy fit sealed the deal for me.
I like them both for the skills they bring to the table. I have had my times critising them both, but thats normal aint it?:hey I have Floyd winning.....if he gets out round 1-4:deal jus cos hes a slow starter. doesnt mean he thta bad,just that he seems to settle after 3-4 rounds. If you are ever going to hit him,it will be at the start of the match.:deal unless you are Cotto who was refreshinly on his game when he fought Floyd:deal