Is Bernard Hopkins BAD FOR BOXING?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Earl-hickey, Aug 11, 2011.


  1. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    Now, wait a minute before the flames begin, I love B-Hop, he's inspirational and a great fighter. However his fights at this stage have trancended common sense and his opponents are put in a position of "win and he was too old, lose and you are a laughing stock"

    Theres no Risk/Reward factor in hopkins fights, it's just Risk.
     
  2. PowerHoock

    PowerHoock Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,084
    3
    Jan 18, 2011
  3. Rilz

    Rilz Ball don't lie! Full Member

    6,836
    4,732
    Aug 5, 2007
    Very bad...racism is bad for any sport.
     
  4. Arcane

    Arcane One More Time Full Member

    15,277
    20
    Oct 23, 2010
    Abortion is pretty bad aswell though I must admit i'm kind of disappointed you're mother didn't consider it with you. :verysad
     
  5. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    5
    Jan 13, 2008
    he is very good for boxing. he promotes fights, he is a great character and is excellent in the ring.
     
  6. prone2gr8tness

    prone2gr8tness Member Full Member

    310
    0
    Sep 4, 2010
    hell no... unless your a white boy
     
  7. Kalasinn

    Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

    18,318
    57
    Dec 26, 2009
    Bhop is great for boxing.

    Dawson will get a lot of credit if he beats him, because everyone knows he's far from "shot".
     
  8. BOGART

    BOGART Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,903
    259
    Jul 19, 2004
    I have to admit after Hopkin's fights with Orneleas and Jones I lost a lot of interest in him and thought he was pretty much at the end. Now, after two great performances in entertaining fights with Pascal, I'm re-interested in the old man again. I'm thinking the Dawson fight is going to lack fireworks and drama but Hopkins atleast has me very interested in the fight itself. He says he wants to fight until he's fifty(which I doubt he does) but if he can competitively I hope he does.
     
  9. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,536
    15,972
    Jul 19, 2004
    Hopkins has always been good for boxing.
     
  10. Terror

    Terror free smoke Full Member

    3,136
    1,500
    Mar 22, 2010
    Of course not. Draws intrigue, puts on great performances, interesting story, tons of charisma, is a legend.
     
  11. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,685
    Sep 8, 2010
    And what does it matter if he was bad for boxing anyway? Like he doesn't have the right to be a pro or something?
     
  12. jeffjoiner

    jeffjoiner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,183
    5
    Jun 22, 2008
    His fights aren't the most exciting, and his clinching and mouthing off probably do alienate a few casual fans. However, he is so beloved by the core fans that he is overall good for the sport.
     
  13. puertorricane

    puertorricane Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,242
    3
    Jan 25, 2010
    when a 46 yr old can beat or be competitive against prime boxers that are champions and young in any division of boxing consistently it shows the sports doesnt have any great fighters anymore.... so yes he's bad for boxing because he's showing boxers now a days are not that good

    46yr old should have no business getting in the ring against top level young fighters

    :hat
     
  14. Bodyshot99

    Bodyshot99 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,732
    17
    Dec 18, 2010
    bad? no. breath of fresh air? yeah sure
     
  15. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    I can't think of a reason why he would be bad for boxing.