just throwing it out there.. what do you think? bika - gave a good account of himself against the #1 supermiddleweight in the world, won the contender, demolished the respected manfredo.. mundine - held a minor title, beat danny, has fought a few names but none anywhere near their prime. multiple losses to 2nd and even 3rd tier fighters.
Sakio Bika fought: Sam Soliman (L,W) Markus Beyer (TD) Joe Calzaghe (L) Lucien Bute (L) Jaidon Codrington (W) Peter Manfredo JR (W) Anthony Mundine fought: Sam Soliman (W,W,W) Sven Ottke (L) Antwun Echols (W) Mikkel Kessler (L) Danny Green (W) Mundine had 2 WBA SMW Regular belts Bika has IBO SMW Belt I would honestly say they are even if you look at it like that but the reason why Bikas is so much better is the fact he fights guys in their prime unlike Anthony and fights guys in their hometown nearly always, unlike Anthony
I personally think Mundine has a better record as it is although Bika has balls the size of basketballs whereas Mundine has a vag#na.
Manfredo is all hype. "multiple losses to 2nd and even 3rd tier fighters" Thats just stupid he has only been beaten 3 times and one off them was to kessler!
Belts don't really mean **** IMO, but I'd say they are about even. However, Bika's loss to #1 Calzaghe > Mundine's loss to #2 Kessler, so I guess that is something to think about.
Yes but he won't, fighting Bika it's a risk, and move on ? come on why? He's happy milking the cow, with no names from south america, and retired guys from Australia, he is in it for the money and nothing more :deal Get used to it
No. Not yet. It's closing quickly though. Mundine is a talanted *****, Sakio is a man and has balls. Step it up Anthony...
