Is Bob Fitzsimmons still a top 30 all time heavyweight?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by janitor, Sep 24, 2018.


  1. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,207
    26,504
    Feb 15, 2006
    Forget how you think he would do head to head, this is an assessment based on accomplishments relative to your era.

    I think that you would be hard put to find 30 heavyweights with a better resume.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  2. Webbiano

    Webbiano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,409
    2,327
    Nov 6, 2011
    I feel like you need to rate him relatively highly or not rate him at all. As much as pains me to say, if h2h starts being taken into equation he falls of dramatically for most people.
     
    Reinhardt likes this.
  3. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,405
    17,977
    Oct 4, 2016

    It's tough to sneak him into the top 30, but possible
     
  4. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    24,977
    8,701
    Jul 15, 2008
    H2H, no .. too small. P4P, top five.
     
    Webbiano likes this.
  5. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,087
    Oct 28, 2017
    Ignoring H2H, I think he'd easilly be top 20.
     
    mcvey, janitor and Webbiano like this.
  6. Webbiano

    Webbiano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,409
    2,327
    Nov 6, 2011
    What the hell, let's give it a try, 30 names, excluding fighters that are yet to retire.

    Wlad
    Lewis
    Tyson
    Holyfield
    Holmes
    Ali
    Foreman
    Frazier
    Liston
    Patterson
    Marciano
    Walcott
    Charles
    Louis
    Schmelling
    Dempsey
    Wills
    Langford
    Johnson
    Jeffries

    That's 20, you could justifiably rank him over some of them names, so I think the better question would be is he a top 20, not top 30

    I'll give you another list of names that could be put in contention, although with most comparative to what they did in their own era, it's hard to see what they really achieved that means they deserve to be ranked above Fitzsimmons without getting into an extensive debate.

    Vitali
    Bowe
    Witherspoon
    Norton
    Ingo
    Moore
    Ray
    Baer
    Braddock
    Sharkey
    Tunney
    Jeanette
    McVea

    Might have missed one or two, if anyone wishes to add any names please do!
     
    janitor likes this.
  7. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,087
    Oct 28, 2017
    Just stream of consciousness, so ignore the exact order, but I think this is about how he'd place. (With that criteria)
    1. Muhammad Ali
    2. Joe Louis
    3. Jack Johnson
    4. James J Jeffries
    5. Larry Holmes
    6. Lennox Lewis
    7. Mike Tyson
    8. George Foreman
    9. Rocky Marciano
    10. John L Sullivan
    11. Wladimir Klitschko
    12. Jack Dempsey
    13. Ezzard Charles
    14. Evander Holyfeild
    15. Bob Fitzsimmons
    16. Jersey Joe Walcott
    17. Sam Langford
    18. Sonny Liston
    19. Floyd Patterson
    20. Max Schemling
    21. Joe Frazier
    22. Peter Jackson
    23. Harry Wills
    24. James J Corbett
    25. Max Baer
    26. Riddick Bowe
    27. Vitali Klitschko
    (Like I said I just did this to work out who I'd place above and below Fitz)
     
    janitor likes this.
  8. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,448
    Jan 6, 2007
    Joe Frazier once said: "I can only fight the guys of my era". In reverse, would Jim Thorpe be rated a top American football player in this era? Thorpe, could run, pass, punt, place kick, and drop kick. Pre-game,
    Thorpe used to drop-kick field goals from the 50 yard line, then turn around and drop-kick a field goal going the other way. Scan the NFL line-up and find a player that can do all of that.
     
    robert ungurean likes this.
  9. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,087
    Oct 28, 2017
    What if you counted Bareknuckle too?

    By the same criteria (my knowledge of some of these guys is just secondry and tertiary stuff), and it's much harder to assess achievement with such sketchy info

    Chucking them in
    1. Muhammad Ali
    2. Joe Louis
    3. Jack Broughton
    4. Jack Johnson
    5. James J Jeffries
    6. Larry Holmes
    7. Tom Cribb
    8. Lennox Lewis
    9. Mike Tyson
    10. George Foreman
    11. Tom King
    12. Rocky Marciano
    13. Jem Mace
    14. John L Sullivan
    15. Benjamin Brian
    16. Tom Johnson
    17. Jack Slack
    18. Wladimir Klitschko
    19. Tom Sayers
    20. Jack Dempsey
    21. Tom Hyer
    22. Ezzard Charles
    23. Daniel Mendoza
    24. Deaf Burke
    25. Samuel O'Rourke
    26. Evander Holyfeild
    27. Bob Fitzsimmons
    28. Jersey Joe Walcott
    29. Sam Langford
    30. Sonny Liston
    31. John Jackson
    32. Floyd Patterson
    33. Jem Belcher
    34. Max Schemling
    35. Henry Pearce
    36. Tom Molineux
    37. Joe Frazier
    38. Peter Jackson
    39. Harry Wills
    40. Gene Tunney
    41. James J Corbett
    42. George Taylor
    43. Max Baer
    44. Riddick Bowe
    45. Vitali Klitschko
    46. John C Heenan


    Just for fun I need a lot more thought and research before a more serious attempt at a bareknuckle ranking, don't take it too seriously.

    Truely all time, you'd ought to add ancient too, but I don't know where to begin with that.
     
    Last edited: Sep 25, 2018
    cross_trainer likes this.
  10. TheCelestialOneAboveAll

    TheCelestialOneAboveAll Member banned Full Member

    127
    36
    Sep 22, 2018
    The answer is no. Bob Fitzsimmons isn't even a top 1000 heavyweight of all time because he isn't a heavyweight by modern standards. If you want to say was a good heavyweight for guys who weight 150 to 170 pounds then that is another story. But compared to modern sized heavyweights he isn't a heavyweight.
     
  11. TheCelestialOneAboveAll

    TheCelestialOneAboveAll Member banned Full Member

    127
    36
    Sep 22, 2018
    If you want to use that logic Deontay Wilder is one the best ever. Just look at his knock out percentage right? Then you would also have to add Anthony Joshua to the list as well. When you ask a person who is the best fighter in a certain weight class then you are talking about head to head. Since the heavyweight division has changed and 150 pound guys aren't heavyweights anymore than Bob wouldn't be ranked in the top 10,000 heavyweights. He wasn't a heavyweight. Never beat any modern sized, modern skilled heavyweights. He was only good for his limited era.
     
  12. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,207
    26,504
    Feb 15, 2006
    What has that got to do with anything?
     
  13. TheCelestialOneAboveAll

    TheCelestialOneAboveAll Member banned Full Member

    127
    36
    Sep 22, 2018
    Um you this thread is called is Bob a top 30 all time heavyweight right? So I told you he isn't a heavyweight but a 150-160 pound fighter. Then you ask me what does that have to do with anything? Classic.
     
  14. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,207
    26,504
    Feb 15, 2006
    We are not talking about head to head here, we are talking about resume relative to era.

    Deontay Wilder would not be in the argument yet, because he has beaten very few world class opponents.

    Anthony Joshua would be starting to get into the equation, but he is still a work in progress.

    Fitzsimmons would have to be in the argument, simply because he destroyed most of the best available opposition.
     
  15. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,207
    26,504
    Feb 15, 2006
    We don't actually know what Bob Fitzsimmons weighed, but lets not get into that argument now.

    What he weighed is completely irrelevant to the discussion.

    If you beat the best heavyweight contenders of your era, then it wouldn't matter if you were a bantamweight.

    You could be ranked at heavyweight, purely based on who you had beaten.
     
    guilalah and BitPlayerVesti like this.