Is Bradley also roided?

Pac will knock him out PEDs or no PEDS!!!

 

Thats been agreed too. Floyd keeps mentioning it to the casula fan who isn't aware

It doesn't make a difference to me as long as those involved are happy. If it was on par with other sports there would be no complaint. As it isn't gives one camp an excuse. So I say just take it and get the fight on. It's the split which isn't fair. Has to be equal or a bigger share for the winner.

As for Bradley as I said above theres no reason to suspect him. What I was referring to was that team pacquiao could have called floyds bluff and taken tests for this fight to show the hold up is with his split demands and not tests which he keeps mentioning. As team pac claims he is willing to take any tests

 

did the greeks have black gods back then:think:huh:shock:

 

No...but the Romans welcomed a Black Emperor: his name was Caracalla (April 4, 188 – April 8, 217).

Rome didn't care who ruled as long as they were arshole enough to keep the people down and kept the Games going.

 

No, but their rendition of Zeus obviously used Timis Bradleis as a template. FACT

 

Caracalla wasn't black, he was Berber/Arab.

 

Yeah...he was Black. And he ruled Rome as an arsehole like the arseholes before him.

Deal. :deal

This content is protected

 

African does not necessarily mean black. As was said, he had some Berber ancestry (and some Roman, Syrian, etc.). He was NOT black. There was never a black emperor of Rome. Romans were racist, despite indeed having high regard for merit.

 

I disagree, I think Bradley might be catching pac at the right time

 

I can't help but to laugh at dolts like you who don't have a clue what they're talking about. Berber is cultural not racial. The name Berber is used by the Greeks for the inhabitants of Berbera several centuries before the appearance of whites and Arabs. The ONLY reason fair skinned Berbers exist in North Africa is due to recent migrations from Europe plain and simple. This new migration assimilated into the existing Berber culture. This can be seen from the fact that these white Berbers share maternal ancestry with Europeans particularly those in the Iberian Peninsula (Spain & Portugal). Even though subtropical climate of the Atlas and northern most Africa may not receive as much UV rays as Sub-Sahara, that fair skin is still maladaptive can be seen in the fact that white Berbers have among the highest rates of skin cancer along with white South Africans who also live in the Subtropics in southern most Africa. These fair-skinned people calling themselves Berbers are LESS BERBER by blood than the Sahrawi and the Haratin.

The historical lies dolts like you push create purely politically-based and idealogically driven founded on your fear, hate, and ignorance designed to continue to promote the absurd idea that Africans did not populate North Africa until after non Africans.

 

hes 165 in the off season. possibly just by looking at his physique. but, really who knows

 

Great post...

 

this!!

 

I understand you have a strong pro-African agenda and that you feel proud that there were Roman emperors with northern African blood in them for whatever reason, but it doesn't change the fact that Caracalla wasn't black. You won't find objective students of history who agree with you, only sad people like yourself and those mindlessly parroting you (who are mindlessly parroting a professor you had as an undergrad) who need historical roots, however false, to fuel their pride in the present.

You're promoting an American viewpoint you were taught in an African Studies class, or perhaps read at a niche website. There is a very strong consensus among anthropologists, geneticists, and historians that you are wrong: the Berbers were not originally black. They are, and always have been, more closely related to other Mediterranean peoples than sub-Saharan Africans. I'm sorry you've been indoctrinated into a nonsensical system of beliefs intended to bolster your sense of self-worth--the rest of the country that doesn't have a racially charged agenda when it comes to history and phenotype, and indeed the rest of the educated world, is laughing at you.

Those of you quoting him: look up the genetic history of North Africa and prepare to be disappointed. Scientific consensus can be difficult to refute. I won't argue it further with closed-minded know-nothings--science is on my side and I have no racially charged agenda to fuel denial of the facts. Besides, Caracalla was a shitty emperor and I'd hardly care to claim him as one of my own even if he was my grandfather.

 

What's going on here? All I know is the Statue of David should be replaced with the Statue of BRADLEY, the true symbol of strength and youthful beauty.