Both annoy me btw, but sadly we can't escape the fact these were the decisions - contrary to what actually happened in both fights.
No, cuts happen and are part of the sport. Last saturday was a ROBBERY!!! ROBBERY!!! ROBBERY!!! V.Klit lost, GET THE **** OVER IT!!!
its nothing like that atall, one was a clear win (for lewis) the other a very dodgy decision. paper skin exists in boxing.... its irefutable
I'm not one of those people who believe Klitschko somehow won the fight. He was winning but the cut changed everything and so Lewis won. It's more the usage of the phrases, as if by simply stating it means you have conclusively won an argument. It does hold more weight in the Pacquaio-Bradley fight, yes. I just don't agree with people who do this "SD12 :deal" crap, when they know there's a lot more to it than that.
No. Lewis actually TKOd Vitali. Bradley got a gift. If Bradley beat Pacquiao then JCC drew with Whitaker, Trinidad beat ODLH, ODLH beat Sturm and Ottke is a legitimately undefeated ATG beat. You get the point.
Just like Lennox was coming on strong when they rescued Vitali. You're right,we should base it on that.
It's a fight that probably should have gone another way if not for the judges versus a fight that probably would have gone another way if not for the cut. Not too similar, but haters will use both. Get used to "SD12."