Is Broner a 130 Mayweather with power, slightly more slickness, less defence?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MVC, Jul 21, 2012.


  1. MVC

    MVC Boxing Junkie banned

    12,389
    7
    Mar 5, 2012
    More Power*
    Slightly more slickness
    Less defence
    Less speed
    Less Ring IQ
     
  2. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
  3. MVC

    MVC Boxing Junkie banned

    12,389
    7
    Mar 5, 2012
    Finally a non ******* post. :good

    You're not longer full ******. :happy
     
  4. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    but you're still one. :thumbsup
     
  5. Flasher KD

    Flasher KD Guest

    almost.. me n price fink he top 15 already

    #FREEFLOYD
     
  6. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    no Broner is a 130 pound version of the modern day Floyd with less defense
    footwork
    IQ
    hand speed (if we're talking about Floyd from a few years ago)
    versatility
    but more power :think

    and he isn't as slick either. Broner doesn't even used that much headmovement really when compared to Floyd. You never see him doing stuff like this
    This content is protected
     
  7. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,419
    10,133
    Jun 23, 2008
    Floyd was the best junior lightweight of all time.

    130-135 Floyd was superior to Broner in every possible way except MAYBE power. And even that's debatable.

    Every other category is not debatable.
     
  8. MVC

    MVC Boxing Junkie banned

    12,389
    7
    Mar 5, 2012
    :nut

    Torrecampo/Singsurat/Bradley/Marquezx3/Morales 1. Mad?
     
  9. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    :yep maybe I should have just said that instead of wasting my time naming out stuff
     
  10. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,419
    10,133
    Jun 23, 2008
    The fact that Floyd had faster hands and more accuracy made him a sharper puncher than Broner.

    However, I think Broner is heavier handed than Floyd.

    That's his ONLY advantage though.
     
  11. SugarShane_24

    SugarShane_24 ESB good-looking member Full Member

    8,929
    39
    Jul 21, 2004
    :lol::lol::lol::lol:
     
  12. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    Floyd was alot better, Mayweather showed virtually no flaws @130.
    (Broner is a bootleg Floyd, Swapmeet version)
    ^Still good tho.

    Exciting fighter.
     
  13. leftleftright

    leftleftright Active Member Full Member

    746
    0
    Apr 12, 2012
    Yup x2

    Broner looked great tonight but there are stages in recent fights that he did not look that good. Can you imagine Eloy Perez in the ring with Floyd? Broner's offense Actually has a lot of Amir Khan in it with his handspeed and quick jabs. He's more of a counterpuncher, but he attacks like Khan.
     
  14. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    More power and thats about it. Floyd is 3x more slick than the stationary broner. Floyd was all over the place at 130, in and out in a blur And floyd fought way better opposition.