Is Broner going to be the man in a weight division soon?

Always makes me laugh to see there are still people believing there are any professional athletes / fitness models / bodybuilders etc etc pretty much anyone who makes their money of their physique or athletic performance that is not on peds.

Its like a grown man still believing in santa.

 

X 2

It's shocking, really...

 

That's an understandable statement to make if you're American, other countries believe in morals, fairplay, and sportsmanship.

 

This truly is one of the more stupid comparisons between two fighters that I've ever seen on any site.

 

Neil Campbell,David McCan,Billy Turley,Ijah Anderson,Chris Armstrong,Paul Edwards,Lisa Kehler,Mark -Lewis Francis,Jason Livingstone,Colin MacCkenzie,Carl Myerscough,Christine Ijeoma Ohuruogu, Callum Priestley,Solomon Ariso,Mark Ashton Richardson, Janine Whitlock,Douglas Walker.
This is the SHORT list of doped up Britt athletes for example.
Morals,fairplay and sportsmanship you say?
They are all doped up no matter if you are from Usa or Madagascar.

 

To be fair, while I agree with the sentiment, that is a thoroughly shitty list. Armstrong and Lewis-Francis tested positive for cannabis, Allen was cocaine, Ohuruogu was for missed drugs tests, Wariso was a minor supplement, etc etc.

Strange that you picked a list including recreational and minor doping offences, when there's obvious high-profile cases like Chambers and Millar that could have been used :huh

 

No country believes that.
Seeing as they are ALL on PEDs or else you won't make it to the pro levels it doesn't matter.
I actually could not care less and i do not view it as cheating seeing as they are all doing it, its simply a level playing field.

What does annoy me is that everybody still lies about it so people that aspire to become a pro athlete stick many years into their dream to find out they HAVE to use it to get to that level.
At which point they already invested too much time to not do it.

Drug testing is a giant farce anyway seeing how easy it is to pass even olympic style drug testing, you only get caught if you overdo it or you **** up your timing.

Oh and im Dutch not American, im just not that naieve.

 

Everybody knows about Chambers and Millar i just wanted to prove something.
It doesnt matter m8,i dont give a **** who is on what.They are all juiced to the gills.
Cannabis,cocaine are on the banned list arent they?And if someone missed the drug test,they missed it for a reason.
They rip Roy here cause of Ripped fuel.I mean....
Everybody is on some ****ing schedule on ESB.

 

I have missed you're hilarious threads, such as this one, where you're trying to ridicule Roy, while trying to hype up Joseph at the same time.

But you've failed again!

The only reason why Joe was the MAN at 168, was because he stayed there for 14 years (while struggling to make weight for the last 4) and didn't move up and test himself at 175.

When you have the talent that Joe had, that is NOT a great achievement!

Anybody who was great who spent 14 years in a division, should be the MAN!

He waited TEN years to unify, because he couldn't get the Ottke fight. When Roy had beaten Toney, and couldn't get the Benn and Liles fights to unify, he dropped the belt and moved up and dominated at 175.

Joe had the same choice as Roy, but decided to STAY!

Once again, you haven't allowed for circumstances.

Winning titles in different weight classes, is a BIGGER achievement that dominating a weak division.

Joe eventually became the man at 168 by beating Kessler in 2007. Who had Kessler beaten at that point? Andrade, Beyer, Mundine.

Joe's biggest win was a disputed win against a 43 year old Hopkins, who had to cheat because he'd ran out of gas.

Roy beat a 28 year old Hopkins, at 24 with a hairline fracture of his right wrist, and Hopkins didn't go on to lose for another 12 years.

How was DM the man at 175?

He'd beaten Hill on points for the WBA and the IBF titles and was wrongfully stripped. But Roy had the WBC, and he crushed Hill in just 4 rounds, he iced Griffin in one, he easily beat Reggie Johnson, he beat Harmon and Hall more convincingly, he beat Harding, he beat Tarver at 34, after 50 fights, after coming back from HW, and he easily beat Gonzalez who went onto beat DM.

Their 175 resumes aren't even close!

Roy was clearly the MAN at 175!

Also, DM never wanted to fight Roy. I've showed you sufficient evidence that support that fact, yet you continue to ignore it.

Why didn't Joe move up to 175, and challenge DM?

Roy's accomplishments, his ability and his resume, absolutely annihilate Joe's.

There's no point answering the actual question regarding Broner, because you're not in the least bit interested.

You've just used his name to try and disguise what your actual intentions are. Which again, is to ridicule Roy, and to hype up Joe, because he's your favourite fighter.

But the intelligent posters on here can see straight through you.

 

Jones had a carefully crafted career where he maneuvered through weight Divisions where he cherry picked a current belt holder or he fought for a vacant belt. Jones loved trinket belts.

 

Yeah, yeah, we've heard all of this a thousand times. But when pressed, you can't prove any of it can you?

 

Plenty of people on here have 'proved' it to you. All you do is ignore it and make ridiculous excuses. How can one guy win 'titles' in 4 Divisions yet not fight so many of those Divisions best fighters

 

Broner could only hope to beat ATGs like Toney or Hopkins.