Is Calzaghe the next Prince?

You dumb piece of ****..You can take James Toney cut out half of his ****ing fights...The ones he won..and he has accomplished more then Calzaghe has or will ever have..James Toney would not be beaten by no damned calzaghe and no way on earth would he ever be put down out in any kind of way. nut---(

Seems like your dumb ass is the one living in LALA land..If you ****ing ****s disrespect another ****ing ATG hall of fame fighters that have mixed it up with other ATG fighters and bring up some god damned Calzaghe and ****ing Kessler...**** YOU>>>>rofl:rofl:rofl COMEDY>>>

 

Or it could just be my take on the matter. I don't need to build up either. Fans with eyes in the head can see they are elites. If you can't well, then you will know later.

It's your take that RJJ will dominate Calzaghe. However, unlike me you seem to undervalue Calzaghes abilities. I'll let you know that I have been a fan of RJJ for many years, and still support him unlike so many other bandwagoneers we have here on the forum.

 

You are not elite for not beating anybody of note that is even close to being elite..This is boxing *****..this is not fantasy football or basketball...You have to be in great fights against champions of high regard...Neither fighter mentioned as done this....EVER....

 

Did you know that Mikkel Kessler would easily defeat James Toney also?

Kessler likely defeats Hagler wide as well. Kessler also matches up extremely well with a prime Bernard Hopkins.

 

I rest my case

 

Do you think Winky Wright defeats Mikkel Kessler?

 

You seem to fail. So you are only elite by beating elites? So you mean before ie Roy Jones jnr beat his first elite, he wasn't? You simply don't know anything, I even highly doubt you have ever watched either man.

 

I cant talk to you anymore..It is pointless and redundant. First I thought you guys were just ****ing with me..Now I know you are serious and it scares the **** out of me..So from both of you deluded morons point of view...Kessler and Calzaghe are the two best fighters from 160-168 over the past 25 years....I mean....that is what you are saying..you cant spin around it...I rest my case.

 

No, last 25 years, Jones is the best from 160-175.

 

you said kessler easily beats toney and hagler and do well with hopkins..so to me..they are probably top 5 fighters from 160-168 over the past 25 years respectfully.....so if kessler can beat those guys he would no doubt be probably #1 by your theory....

 

It was a valid question. In fact a very good one you posted in your OP.

Firstly I need to emphesize that I wrote "primer" - not prime. Meaning that todays RJJ would of course not be a fair comparison.

Hamed was a good fighter, and I hated him as much as the next guy for his arrogant attitude. I held my fingers crossed throughout the fight for MAB to beat him. Still in hindsight, Hamed did very good vs such a skilled opponent - too good to be called anything less than a very good fighter. It might have been that Hamed was caught in the web of the arrogant image, it might have been that that led him to not fighting at top level again; the higher you fly the deeper you fall. He was still a good fighter, but nowhere near the quality of JC, as I see it.

Even if I think you have posted fairly, I dont think that just because you hate the british should mean you think less of a fighter(not that i think your posting reflects it) - he can't help it where he was born - nor have most british supported him.