Is Canelo 0-3 against his best 2 opponents? (Floyd and GGG)

The Clenelo hate in the boxing community is getting RIDICULOUS and INSANE.

I'm truly disgusted. And i don't like him either but i respect what he did over the last 3 years in the ring.

 

I had the first GGG fight 116-112 to GGG and the second fight slightly wider at 117-111

I know most people had the second fight slighly closer than the first.

But everyone at the time still gave the second fight to GGG

Since then history has been re-written a bit, and now a lot of people are incorrectly claiming that Canelo won the second fight. He didnt, sorry.

But this is typical when you are the A side and the face of boxing...people re-write history for you...

 

The only fighter consistently making big fights happen. I think everyone should at least respect that.

 

Calling him Clenelo isnt respect.

 

0-4 against his best 3. . Put respect on Lara's name.

 

He never lost to GGG. Canelo clearly won fight 2, landed the far more telling punches and outboxed his ass.

 

You just said four wrong things in two sentences, way to go M, trolling doubletime!

 

He should be 0-59 but then he got in the ring with them.

He's 0-2-1 as far as I'm concerned. Lara did nothing to earn the win, no one should be questioning the Trout win.

 

Lara ran more than Macho Camacho on his worst day and more than Usain Bolt on his best day. And slapped while he was on his bike. Canelo win, Lara loss.

 

8-4 both of them for GGG.

 

He took Clenbuterol. So i call him Clenelo. It's just a fact.

 

I rewatched second GGG vs Canelo fight on Saturday and i gave GGG 4 rounds. Canelo gassed as usual in later rounds, but its easier to give him disputable rounds, because his defence and fast counter punching were more impressive.

 

Ran and slapped yeah but landed enough slaps and jabs to more than offset Canelo's extremely ineffective front-foot aggression, missing 90% of what he threw, including to Lara's body. Lara win, Canelo loss.

 

He didnt take Clenbuteral, there were trace amounts of the substance in the meat he ate, thats a proven fact, there's a difference, no?

 

That was not proven to be fact. The labs only said it was 'consistent' with eating meat. There's a difference, No?